Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-20
2025-08-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Does the ESP block reduce pain levels in the first 24 hours after surgery?
Does it lower the need for opioid pain medication?
Does it reduce the need for additional (rescue) pain treatment?
Does it decrease the likelihood of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)?
Participants will be randomly placed into one of two groups:
ESP Block Group: Participants will receive an ESP block using 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance before surgery.
Control Group: Participants will receive standard pain management without a nerve block.
All participants will receive general anesthesia during surgery and multimodal pain management after surgery. Researchers will compare pain scores, opioid use, rescue analgesic needs, and the occurrence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block on Postoperative in Patients Undergoing Nephrectomy.
NCT04703634
Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block(ESPB) in Lumbar Discectomy
NCT06028100
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Patients: a Retrospective Study
NCT03897933
Intraoperative Placement of Superficial Erector Spinae Plane Block; A New Approach in Spine Surgery
NCT05244031
Effectivenes of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?
NCT04474873
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Control Group: No block will be performed, and patients will receive standard postoperative multimodal analgesia.
Procedure Description: The ESP block will be performed under sterile conditions with a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe. A 100-mm echogenic needle will be inserted in a cephalocaudal direction to deposit the local anesthetic deep to the erector spinae muscle at the transverse process level. The correct spread of the anesthetic will be confirmed via real-time ultrasound imaging.
All patients will receive standardized general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia.
Outcome measures include postoperative pain (NRS), opioid consumption, rescue analgesia requirement, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ESP Block Group
A regional anesthesia technique in which 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected under ultrasound guidance at the T8-T10 level to provide postoperative pain relief.
Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block
A regional anesthesia technique in which 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected under ultrasound guidance at the T8-T10 level to provide postoperative pain relief.
Control Group
Patients will receive routine multimodal analgesia without an ESP block.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block
A regional anesthesia technique in which 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine is injected under ultrasound guidance at the T8-T10 level to provide postoperative pain relief.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Age: 18-65 years.
ASA I-II.
Willing to participate and provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
Allergy to local anesthetics.
Coagulation disorders or use of anticoagulants.
Patients requiring emergency surgery.
Patients with infection at the ESP block site.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Namik Kemal University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Onur Baran
Asst. Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ayhan Şahin, Assoc. Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Namik Kemal University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University Research Hospital
Tekirdağ, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
Bryniarski P, Bialka S, Kepinski M, Szelka-Urbanczyk A, Paradysz A, Misiolek H. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 31;18(7):3625. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073625.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TNKU-URS001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.