Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block in Postoperative Pain Management After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
NCT ID: NCT07287761
Last Updated: 2025-12-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-11-01
2026-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This prospective, observational study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of two different regional anesthesia techniques, the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and the Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB), in managing postoperative pain in patients undergoing CABG via median sternotomy.
Patients aged 18-80 years, classified as ASA II-III, who are scheduled for elective CABG will be included. The choice of block technique (ESPB or SPSIPB) will be determined by the operating anesthesiologist based on the visibility of anatomical structures (transverse processes) under ultrasound guidance. All patients will receive the same general anesthesia and be managed postoperatively with Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA).
The main goal is to determine which block provides optimal pain control, measured by the time to first rescue analgesia and pain scores (NRS) at various time points after extubation. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative opioid consumption, total PCA usage, extubation time, and the incidence of opioid-related side effects. The findings will help optimize pain protocols for cardiac surgery patients.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Rationale for Comparison:
The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) has proven efficacy in thoracic and abdominal procedures. The Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) is being investigated as a potential alternative, targeting a broader area to manage pain in cardiac surgery. The study aims to provide clinical evidence regarding which of these two specific regional techniques offers superior postoperative pain control in this patient population.
Procedure Detail (Specific to Observation):
The selection of the block type (ESPB or SPSIPB) for the patient is determined intraoperatively by the experienced anesthesiologist based on the quality of the ultrasound image (visibility of the transverse processes) to ensure the most anatomically suitable block is performed.
Anesthesia Protocol (Standardized):
All enrolled patients (ASA II-III) will receive the same general anesthesia protocol (Thiopental, Fentanyl, Rocuronium for induction; Sevoflurane for maintenance). The regional block will be administered by a single experienced anesthesiologist under the supervision of the responsible investigator, using a bilateral injection of 30 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine for both techniques. Postoperative analgesia will be managed using a standardized Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (PCA) device, set at a 3mg/ml concentration, with a 24mg bolus dose and a 20-minute lockout interval.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ESPB Group
Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) with Bupivacaine
No interventions assigned to this group
SPSIPB Group
Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) with Bupivacaine
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 80 years.
* Classification of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class II or III.
* Patients who provide written and verbal informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Age older than 80 years or ASA Physical Status Class \> III.
* Patients who do not understand the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) or have communication difficulties.
* Patients with a known history of coagulation disorders or bleeding disorders.
* Patients with skin infection at the site of peripheral nerve block application.
* Patients with Morbid Obesity (Body Mass Index BMI\>35 kg/m2).
* Patients with chronic pain, opioid or substance dependence, or who use chronic analgesics.
* Patients with known allergy to local anesthetics.
* Patients with liver or kidney function disorders.
* Patients with a history of previous median sternotomy operation.
* Patients undergoing emergency surgery.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara Education and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdullah KONAN
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, Altındag, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Suna AKIN TAKMAZ, M.D
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Abdullah KONAN, M.D
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tulgar S, Ciftci B, Ahiskalioglu A, Bilal B, Sakul BU, Korkmaz AO, Bozkurt NN, De Cassai A, Torres AJ, Elsharkawy H, Alici HA. Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block: A Technical Report on the Description of a Novel Periparavertebral Block for Thoracic Pain. Cureus. 2023 Feb 3;15(2):e34582. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34582. eCollection 2023 Feb.
Rothaug J, Zaslansky R, Schwenkglenks M, Komann M, Allvin R, Backstrom R, Brill S, Buchholz I, Engel C, Fletcher D, Fodor L, Funk P, Gerbershagen HJ, Gordon DB, Konrad C, Kopf A, Leykin Y, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Puig M, Rawal N, Taylor RS, Ullrich K, Volk T, Yahiaoui-Doktor M, Meissner W. Patients' perception of postoperative pain management: validation of the International Pain Outcomes (IPO) questionnaire. J Pain. 2013 Nov;14(11):1361-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
Wang AH, Juan AH, Ko KD, Tsai PF, Zare H, Dell'Orso S, Sartorelli V. The Elongation Factor Spt6 Maintains ESC Pluripotency by Controlling Super-Enhancers and Counteracting Polycomb Proteins. Mol Cell. 2017 Oct 19;68(2):398-413.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
Mazzeffi M, Khelemsky Y. Poststernotomy pain: a clinical review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):1163-78. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Sep 29. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
496
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id