Comparing Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block With Erector Spinae Plane Block

NCT ID: NCT05023850

Last Updated: 2022-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-10

Study Completion Date

2022-05-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Major spinal surgery causes greater pain in the postoperative 24 hours. Patients with severe pain may have prolonged hospital stays and delay in mobilization. In addition, chronic pain may be seen in these patients due to ineffectively managed acute postoperative pain. Therefore, optimizing acute postoperative analgesia is a priority in patients undergoing major spinal surgery.

Recently, ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks such as thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIPB)and the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) have been described in spinal surgery. Both blocks clinically seem to be safe and easily performed. The aims of this study are to compare the quality of recovery scores, overall morbidity and postoperative analgesia after major spinal surgery in patients receiving either TLIPB or ESPB.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIPB)and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and have been shown to provide effective analgesia after spinal surgery. ESPB targets ventral and dorsal rami of the spinal nerve and also spreads over the paravertebral and epidural space. However, TLIPB targets only dorsal rami of the spinal nerve and spare ventral rami which may provide early ambulation. In addition, depositing local anesthetic in the fascial planes may prevent intraoperative washout. It may translate to an increase in the quality of analgesia. On the other hand, pain is an incomplete measure of postoperative recovery. No study to date has compared these two blocks in terms of the quality of recovery after major spinal surgery. This study will test the hypothesis that patients receiving TLIPB have higher QoR-40 scores in comparison with patients receiving ESPB.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Surgery Quality of Recovery Postoperative Analgesia Postoperative Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized control trial one group receives Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block the other receives Erector Spinae Plane Block
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Blocks will be administered after induction of General Anesthesia so participants will be blinded to which intervention they have had.

Study investigators will not be aware of what group the participant belongs to when assessing the patient's post-operative period

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group TLIP

Patients will receive a Thoracolumbar Plane Block (TLIPB) under ultrasound guidance while under general anesthesia.

Intervention: Patients will receive a TLIPB with 20mls 0.25% Bupivicaine bilaterally.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TLIPB

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will receive TLIPB with an injection of 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% (2 injections of 20 ml on each side) between multifidus and longissimus muscles.

Group ESP

Patients will receive an Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) under ultrasound guidance while under general anesthesia.

Intervention: Procedure: Patients will receive an ESPB with 20 ml 0.25% Bupivacaine bilaterally.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ESPB

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will receive ESPB with an injection of 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% (2 injections of 20 ml on each side) between erector spinae muscle and transverse process of a vertebra.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TLIPB

Patients will receive TLIPB with an injection of 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% (2 injections of 20 ml on each side) between multifidus and longissimus muscles.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ESPB

Patients will receive ESPB with an injection of 40 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% (2 injections of 20 ml on each side) between erector spinae muscle and transverse process of a vertebra.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Global Quality of Recovery-40 score Standard Pain Follow up and Monitorization Global Quality of Recovery-40 score Standard Pain Followup and Monitorization

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

-≥ 18 years old,

* Undergoing posterior lumbar spinal one to three levels fusion surgery
* Having signed a written informed consent form,
* ASAI-III

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication for regional anesthesia (allergy to local anesthetics, neuropathic disease, infection at the puncture site, coagulation disorder, refusal of the technique,…)
* Contraindication to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,
* Patient who has already had a spinal surgery,
* Patient with chronic pain syndrome (use \> 3 months of morphine, opioid analgesics of class 3, pregabalin or gabapentin) or fibromyalgia,
* A mental or linguistic inability to understand the study,
* Pregnant or or breastfeeding women,
* Patient who can not communicate in Turkish
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karaman Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Betul Basaran, MD, DESA

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Karaman Training and Research Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karaman Training and Research Hospital

Karaman, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

05-2021/13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

mTLIP vs. ITP Blocks in Lumbar Disc Surgery
NCT06391541 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA