Comparing Erector Spinae and Fascia Iliaca Blocks for Pain Relief After Femur Surgery.
NCT ID: NCT06990958
Last Updated: 2025-12-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
92 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-05
2025-08-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal is to determine which nerve block provides more effective pain relief, reduces the need for opioid medications, and supports faster recovery in patients following femur surgery. Results from this study may improve pain management strategies for similar procedures in the future.
Adults scheduled for proximal or midshaft femur surgery may be eligible to participate. Eligibility is determined based on clinical criteria reviewed by the study team.Administration of one of the two nerve blocks before surgery.Standard surgical and postoperative care.
Monitoring of pain levels at specific time points after surgery
Recording of opioid medication usage
Evaluation of patient satisfaction and any side effects related to the nerve block
Duration:
The intervention (nerve block) is administered once before surgery. Data collection continues during the immediate postoperative period and for a short time following surgery to assess outcomes.
Both nerve blocks are considered safe and are regularly used in clinical practice.
All procedures are performed by qualified clinicians, and safety monitoring is conducted throughout the study.
Participants may experience improved pain relief and reduced need for opioid medications. While direct benefit cannot be guaranteed, information gained from the study may help improve pain management for future patients undergoing similar surgeries.
Participation in the study is completely voluntary. Patients may choose not to participate or may withdraw from the study at any time without affecting the quality of their medical care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ESP Block vs FIB in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05015517
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05905510
Erector Spinae Block Versus Local Field Block in Lumbar Spine Surgeries
NCT05570565
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Fascia Iliaca Block vs Lumbar Plexus Block for Postoperative Analgesia for Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06573931
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Modified Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block
NCT06910696
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ESPB Group
patients was placed in the lateral position . the block was performed bz ipsilateral injection of a mixture containing 15mls bupivcaine 0,5% and 20mls normal saline.
Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) group
ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block (at lumbar level) in lateral position .
FICB
Patients was placed insupine position . the block performed using a mixture of 15mls bupivcaine 0,5% and 20mls normal saline.
Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB)
ultrasound guided suprainguinal approach in supine position
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) group
ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block (at lumbar level) in lateral position .
Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB)
ultrasound guided suprainguinal approach in supine position
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American society of Anathesiologist physical status ASA Ior II
* Patients undergoing Fixation of femur fractures
Exclusion Criteria
2. Bleeding disorders (platelets count \< 80,000, INR \>1.5, Prothrombin concentration \< 60%).
3. Skin lesion, wounds or infection at the puncture site. Known allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
4. Known local anesthetic (LA) drug sensitivity. -
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Wissam Ahmed Mohamed El Damacey
Lecturer of Anesthesia, surgical ICU and Pain Management Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
kasr alainy hospital -Cairo university , cairo
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MS-212-2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.