Erector Spinae Plane Block For Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

NCT ID: NCT03741348

Last Updated: 2019-02-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-15

Study Completion Date

2018-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of bilateral ESPB on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

60 patients Scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy, after obtaining a written informed consent for anesthesia from each patient before enrolment in the study after explaining to them the nature of study.

Inclusion criteria included female patients aged 40 - 70 years, Weighted 50 - 90 Kg and with American society of anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) class Ι to ΙΙΙ Scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia. Exclusion criteria included Local infection at the site of puncture, Patients having history of hematological disorders, including coagulation abnormality, Patients with severe hepatic impairment, Patients with chronic pain and Patient had a known allergy to study drugs.

Patients were randomized into two equal groups. An online randomization program was used to generate random number list. Patient randomization numbers were concealed in opaque envelops which were opened by the study investigator.

Members of the study group involved in obtaining functional data were blinded to randomization for the period of data acquisition and analysis. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups:

Erector spinae plane block Group (ES): ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block at T9 vertebrae level with 20 ml of bupivacaine 0. 5%. Control Group (c): did not receive block.

One day before surgery all patients were interviewed to explain visual analogue scale (VAS), learned how to use patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pump and routine investigations were fulfilled.

In both groups Patients were monitored with ECG, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring and pulse oximetry. IV access was established and IV midazolam 0.01-0.02 mg.kg-1 was given.

In (ES) group After skin sterilization, ESPB was performed in sitting position at the level of T9 linear ultrasound (US) transducer (Phillips-Saronno Italy) was placed vertically 3cm lateral to midline to visualize the muscles of the back: the trapezius muscle above, the rhomboid major muscle in the middle and the erector-spinae muscle on the bottom, transverse process and simmering pleura in between the two transverse processes. After local infiltration of needle insertion site with 2-3ml of 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge Short bevel needle (Spinocan, B.Braun Melsungen AG, Germany) was inserted in cranial-caudal direction towards transverse process (TP) in-plane to the US transducer until needle touched the TP crossing all the muscles. Correct needle placement was confirmed by Visualizing the needle in plane along its entire length, when it contacted the transverse process, 1 ml of anesthetic solution was injected. Hydrodissection of the interfascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process was confirmed by visualizing the local anesthetic spreading in a linear pattern between the muscle and the bony acoustic shadows of the transverse process, ensuring correct localization. Then, up to 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% was injected. The procedure was repeated following the same steps on the other side of back. Control Group (c): the same pervious technique as in ES group but patient did not receive block.

Block success was tested by reduced cold sensation at planned surgical incision 5 minutes after block completion.

General anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 mcg.kg-1, propofol 2 mg.kg-1 followed by atracium 0.5 mg.kg-1 and after intubation Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (1 MAC) and atracium 0.1mg.kg-1 as a maintenance dose every 30 minutes till the end of the procedure; After emerging from anesthesia, the patients were transferred to the post aesthesia care unit (PACU) for a 2 hours observation period. The patients were discharged from the PACU after fulfilling the discharge criteria based on Aldrete score. Postoperative analgesia was provided in both groups immediately after surgery by PCA fentanyl pump then regular oral acetaminophen 1 g four times a day.

The criteria to stop fentanyl titration protocol were satisfactory pain control, Patient became sedated (Ramsay sedation scale \>2), Respiratory rate \< 12 / min, Oxygen saturation \< 95% or development of serious adverse effects (allergy, severe vomiting, hypotension).

Visual analogue pain score (VAS) for pain (ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 maximum pain) was measured postoperatively at 30 min and 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hour postoperative.

Any side effects were recorded as nausea or vomiting, pneumothorax, or any other complications. Also Duration of hospital stays, from the first day postoperative until discharge.

The primary outcome of this study was Total fentanyl consumption in the first 24 hours And The secondary outcome was VAS for pain (ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 maximum pain) was evaluated postoperatively at 30 min and 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hour postoperative, Duration of hospital stays and any complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ES

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Erector Spinae Plane Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In (ES) group After skin sterilization, ESPB was performed in sitting position at the level of T9 linear ultrasound (US) transducer (Phillips-Saronno Italy) was placed vertically 3cm lateral to midline to visualize the muscles of the back, transverse process and simmering pleura in between the two transverse processes. After local infiltration of needle insertion site with 2-3ml of 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge Short bevel needle (Spinocan, B.Braun Melsungen AG, Germany) was inserted in cranial-caudal direction towards transverse process (TP) in-plane to the US transducer until needle touched the TP crossing all the muscles. Then, up to 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% was injected. The procedure was repeated following the same steps on the other side of back.

control

the control group will not receive block

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

control

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

in control group, Erector Spinae Plane Block will not be done

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Erector Spinae Plane Block

In (ES) group After skin sterilization, ESPB was performed in sitting position at the level of T9 linear ultrasound (US) transducer (Phillips-Saronno Italy) was placed vertically 3cm lateral to midline to visualize the muscles of the back, transverse process and simmering pleura in between the two transverse processes. After local infiltration of needle insertion site with 2-3ml of 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge Short bevel needle (Spinocan, B.Braun Melsungen AG, Germany) was inserted in cranial-caudal direction towards transverse process (TP) in-plane to the US transducer until needle touched the TP crossing all the muscles. Then, up to 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% was injected. The procedure was repeated following the same steps on the other side of back.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

control

in control group, Erector Spinae Plane Block will not be done

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* female patients
* Aged 40 - 70 years,
* Weighted 50 - 90 Kg
* American society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) class Ι to ΙΙΙ
* Scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Local infection at the site of puncture
* Patients having a history of hematological disorders, including coagulation abnormality
* Patients with severe hepatic impairment
* Patients with chronic pain
* A patient had a known allergy to study drugs.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fayoum University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed hamed

lecturer of anesthesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

mohamed a hamed, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fayoum University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mohamed

Al Fayyum, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Azari L, Santoso JT, Osborne SE. Optimal pain management in total abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013 Mar;68(3):215-27. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31827f5119.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23945838 (View on PubMed)

Carney J, McDonnell JG, Ochana A, Bhinder R, Laffey JG. The transversus abdominis plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):2056-60. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181871313.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19020158 (View on PubMed)

Ueshima H, Otake H. Similarities Between the Retrolaminar and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):123-124. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000526. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27997492 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R124

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.