The Impact of Force Feedback in the dV5 Robotic Surgical System on Learning Curve and Safety in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy - A Prospective, Single-Center, Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trial
NCT ID: NCT07247175
Last Updated: 2025-11-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE2
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-01
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A total of 60 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer will be enrolled at Samsung Medical Center. Two surgeons (one faculty and one trainee) will each perform 30 RARP cases, with Force Feedback ON/OFF randomly assigned for each case. The primary endpoints are (1) mean traction force and (2) total instrument path length during seminal vesicle dissection. Secondary endpoints include surgical performance metrics (time, clutch counts), intraoperative safety, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes (IPSS, IIEF-5, EPIC-CP, ICIQ-UI SF). Data will be analyzed using mixed-effects models accounting for surgeon-level random effects.
This study seeks to provide quantitative evidence on how Force Feedback enhances surgical learning efficiency, precision, and patient safety in next-generation robotic prostate surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Recruitment Maneuver in Patients Undergoing Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT02013011
Posterior Extra-fascial RARP in Intermediate or High Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT06434649
Study of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed on Outpatient in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT04319146
Quality of Life in Men Undergoing Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
NCT01173952
The Effect of Deep Neuromuscular Blockade on Respiratory Mechanics
NCT04174222
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Robotic-assisted surgery has revolutionized minimally invasive prostate cancer treatment, but conventional robotic systems (e.g., da Vinci Xi) lack tactile feedback, forcing surgeons to rely solely on visual cues. This limitation may lead to excessive force application and increase the risk of tissue injury. The dV5 system introduces a Force Feedback mechanism that allows surgeons to feel real-time resistance transmitted through the robotic arms. Preclinical reports suggest this reduces applied forces by up to 40-50% and improves precision, especially during the learning phase. However, objective clinical data quantifying these benefits are limited.
The present trial will enroll 60 patients diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer (cT1-T3a, N0, M0) eligible for RARP. Two surgeons-a senior faculty (expert) and a urology resident (trainee)-will each perform 30 RARP cases. For each surgery, the Force Feedback function will be randomly assigned (ON vs. OFF) while maintaining identical operative conditions. The seminal vesicle dissection step is chosen as the standardized assessment phase since it is technically demanding yet safe for educational evaluation.
Primary endpoints are:
Mean traction force applied to tissue (N)
Total instrument path length (m) during seminal vesicle dissection
Secondary endpoints include:
Surgical performance metrics: operative time, clutch counts, peak force, efficiency indicators, and cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curves.
Safety parameters: estimated blood loss, complications (graded by Clavien-Dindo), hospital stay, and biochemical recurrence.
Patient-reported outcomes: urinary, sexual, and overall quality of life assessed by validated questionnaires (IPSS, IIEF-5, EPIC-CP, ICIQ-UI SF).
Procedural efficiency metrics such as lens-cleaning frequency and suction count.
All operations will be video-recorded and digitally logged using dV5 Case Insight software, which captures objective performance indicators (OPIs) including instrument trajectory, applied force, and clutch frequency. Statistical analysis will use linear mixed-effects models with Force Feedback status and case sequence as fixed effects, and surgeon ID as a random effect, allowing adjustment for intra-surgeon correlations and learning effects.
Safety monitoring follows institutional IRB and KGCP guidelines. All adverse events (AEs) and device deficiencies will be documented, with serious adverse events (SAEs) reported within 24 hours. Standard perioperative management and intraoperative supervision by experienced faculty will ensure patient safety.
This study is designed as a pilot exploratory analysis that integrates human performance data, haptic sensor output, and clinical outcomes. Findings will offer the first objective evidence on how haptic feedback influences both novice and expert robotic surgeons in terms of force modulation, precision, efficiency, and safety. The results may guide the optimization of training curricula and inform the development of future robotic platforms incorporating tactile intelligence.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Force-feedback on
Force-feedback on
In this study, the "Force-Feedback ON" intervention refers to performing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci 5 (dV5) system with its haptic feedback function activated. When this mode is ON, miniature force sensors built into the robotic instruments continuously detect the mechanical resistance encountered at the instrument tips and transmit it back to the surgeon's hand controllers in real time.
This tactile feedback allows the operator to feel the intensity and direction of traction or pressure applied to tissues, enabling finer motion control, reduced tissue stress, and safer dissection. In contrast, when Force Feedback is OFF, the surgeon relies solely on visual cues, as in all previous-generation robotic systems.
Thus, "Force-Feedback ON" represents an active tactile-sensing mode designed to enhance precision, promote gentler handling, and improve training efficiency during robotic surgery.
Force-feedback off
Forece-feedback off
Off force-feedback function
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Force-feedback on
In this study, the "Force-Feedback ON" intervention refers to performing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci 5 (dV5) system with its haptic feedback function activated. When this mode is ON, miniature force sensors built into the robotic instruments continuously detect the mechanical resistance encountered at the instrument tips and transmit it back to the surgeon's hand controllers in real time.
This tactile feedback allows the operator to feel the intensity and direction of traction or pressure applied to tissues, enabling finer motion control, reduced tissue stress, and safer dissection. In contrast, when Force Feedback is OFF, the surgeon relies solely on visual cues, as in all previous-generation robotic systems.
Thus, "Force-Feedback ON" represents an active tactile-sensing mode designed to enhance precision, promote gentler handling, and improve training efficiency during robotic surgery.
Forece-feedback off
Off force-feedback function
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Histologically confirmed localized prostate cancer, clinical stage T1-T3a, N0, M0.
Scheduled to undergo robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at Samsung Medical Center.
No radiologic evidence of distant metastasis, and disease deemed surgically resectable via robotic approach.
Medically fit for general anesthesia and laparoscopic surgery, classified as ASA physical status I-III.
Baseline erectile function preserved, defined as IIEF-5 ≥12 within 6 months prior to surgery.
Provided written informed consent for participation after full explanation of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
Prostate volume ≥60 cc on preoperative MRI, which may complicate robotic dissection standardization.
History of pelvic radiotherapy for any malignancy.
Previous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or other hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.
History of prior prostate surgery, such as TURP or HoLEP.
History of spinal cord injury or major pelvic surgery that may alter pelvic anatomy.
Medical contraindications to robotic/laparoscopic surgery or general anesthesia (e.g., severe cardiopulmonary disease, ASA ≥ IV).
Anatomic limitations (e.g., extreme obesity or deformity) precluding safe robotic access.
Device or software malfunction preventing proper activation or deactivation of the Force Feedback system.
Any other condition deemed inappropriate for study participation by the principal investigator (e.g., cognitive impairment affecting consent or follow-up).
19 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seong Soo Jeon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Seong Soo Jeon
Professor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025-05-021-003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.