Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy Performed by Robot-assisted Laparoscopy or Conventional Laparoscopy or by Laparotomy

NCT ID: NCT04638088

Last Updated: 2024-11-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

2000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-08

Study Completion Date

2030-04-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Minimally invasive surgery has developed widely since the 1980s and has revolutionized the practices of surgeons. In urology, the development of laparoscopy and then robot-assisted surgery has considerably improved the management of pathologies. In France, as in all the countries concerned, the spread of robotic surgery has taken place without prior studies validating this new technology, nor organizational rules in terms of quality and access to care. The report of the Haute Autorité de Santé dated November 2016 underlines the weakness of the methodological quality of studies and meta-analyzes evaluating robot-assisted total prostatectomy compared to other surgical techniques by laparotomy or conventional laparoscopy. It therefore appears important to evaluate in a large study the interest of this technique in order to help the authorities to decide on the real benefit of this technology and to provide reliable answers to the patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Minimally invasive surgery has developed widely since the 1980s and has revolutionized the practices of surgeons. In urology, the development of laparoscopy and then robot-assisted surgery has considerably improved the management of pathologies. In France, as in all the countries concerned, the spread of robotic surgery has taken place without prior studies validating this new technology, nor organizational rules in terms of quality and access to care. The report of the Haute Autorité de Santé dated November 2016 underlines the weakness of the methodological quality of studies and meta-analyzes evaluating robot-assisted total prostatectomy compared to other surgical techniques by laparotomy or conventional laparoscopy. It therefore appears important to evaluate in a large study the interest of this technique in order to help the authorities to decide on the real benefit of this technology and to provide reliable answers to the patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

robot-assisted laparoscopy

radical prostatectomy performed by robot-assisted laparoscopy

assessment of urinary function and erectil function before and after prostatectomy

Intervention Type OTHER

assessment of urinary function and erectil function before and after prostatectomy performed by robot assisted or conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy will complete

conventional laparoscopy

radical prostatectomy performed by conventional laparoscopy

assessment of urinary function and erectil function before and after prostatectomy

Intervention Type OTHER

assessment of urinary function and erectil function before and after prostatectomy performed by robot assisted or conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy will complete

laparotomy

radical prostatectomy performed by laparotomy

assessment of urinary function and erectil function before and after prostatectomy

Intervention Type OTHER

assessment of urinary function and erectil function before and after prostatectomy performed by robot assisted or conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy will complete

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

assessment of urinary function and erectil function before and after prostatectomy

assessment of urinary function and erectil function before and after prostatectomy performed by robot assisted or conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy will complete

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patient hospitalized for a planned radical prostatectomy

Exclusion Criteria

* Consent refusal from the patient
* Patients protected by law (Art.L 1121-5, 1121-6, 1121-8 du Code de la santé publique)
* Absence of a French Health Care Insurance coverage
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Elsan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shahnaz KLOUCHE, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Elsan

Pierre-Thierry PIECHAUD, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Elsan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinique Esquirol Saint Hilaire

Agen, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinique Rhône Durance

Avignon, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Hôpital Privé La Châtaigneraie

Beaumont, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Clinique St Vincent

Besançon, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Polyclinique de Franche Comté

Besançon, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Clinique de Saint Augustin

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Clinique Keraudren - CHPB

Brest, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Centre Médico-Chirurgical Les Cèdres

Brive-la-Gaillarde, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Polyclinique Médipôle Saint-Roch

Cabestany, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Polyclinique du Parc

Caen, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Polyclinique Montréal

Carcassonne, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Pôle Santé République

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Hôpital Privé Saint-François

Désertines, , France

Site Status WITHDRAWN

Clinique Cap-d'Or

La Seyne-sur-Mer, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Pôle Santé Sud

Le Mans, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Clinique Emailleurs-Colombier

Limoges, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Polyclinique de Limoges

Limoges, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Clinique Claude Bernard

Metz, , France

Site Status WITHDRAWN

Polyclinique de Gentilly

Nancy, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Clinique Saint-Augustin

Nantes, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Polyclinique Grand Sud

Nîmes, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Polyclinique Les Fleurs

Ollioules, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Polyclinique de Poitiers

Poitiers, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinique du Renaison

Roanne, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Clinique Guillaume De Varye

Saint-Doulchard, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Centre clinical

Soyaux, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Clinique de l'Estrée

Stains, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Clinique Ambroise Paré

Toulouse, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Polyclinique Vauban

Valenciennes, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Hôpital privé Océane

Vannes, , France

Site Status COMPLETED

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shahnaz KLOUCHE, MD

Role: CONTACT

00331 58 56 41 71

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Xavier CUVILLIER, MD

Role: primary

00335 53 69 27 15

Maxime THOULOUZAN, MD

Role: primary

00332 98 34 29 42

Pascal BOURNEL, MD

Role: primary

Frédéric VAVDIN, MD

Role: primary

Arnaud SCHOENIG, MD

Role: primary

00334 73 99 49 49

Nicolas LESAUX, MD

Role: primary

Christian PEYRET, MD

Role: primary

Thierry BETHMONT, MD

Role: primary

Frédéric JONCA, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GCS-ELSAN-0620

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.