Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-06-30
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Robot-assisted vs Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Treatment
NCT04011865
3D Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.
NCT03550040
The Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach
NCT06020287
Improved Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: Bladder Suspension and Preliminary Outcomes
NCT06977906
Study of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed on Outpatient in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT04319146
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To evaluate pain and analgesic requirement of R-LESS RP compared to standard RALP.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Time to oral intake. II. Time to resume ambulation. III. Hospital stay, counted in whole days from the day of surgery to the day of discharge.
IV. Perioperative parameters, including: operative time (defined as time elapsed from skin incision to placement of the final skin suture); estimated blood loss; additional ports; conversion to standard RALP (in R-LESS RP patients), or laparoscopic, or open surgery; length of stay.
V. Intraoperative complications. VI. Postoperative complications, recorded according to the Clavien classification.
VII. Body image perception, measured using the body image questionnaire (BIQ). VIII. Scar evaluation (at suture removal and at 6 month) by using a validated assessment tool, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
IX. Health related quality of life, measured as patients' perception of functioning, disability, and well-being related to the following eight concepts: physical functioning, role limitations caused by physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitation caused by emotional problems, and mental health.
X. Urinary continence, assessing the number of pads used daily. XI. Erectile Function, assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5).
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo standard RALP.
ARM II: Patients undergo R-LESS RP.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for 1 year.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (RALP)
Patients undergo standard RALP.
robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
Undergo RALP
laboratory biomarker analysis
Correlative studies
quality-of-life assessment
Ancillary studies
questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies
Arm II (R-LESS RP)
Patients undergo R-LESS RP.
robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
Undergo R-LESS RP
laboratory biomarker analysis
Correlative studies
quality-of-life assessment
Ancillary studies
questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
Undergo RALP
robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
Undergo R-LESS RP
laboratory biomarker analysis
Correlative studies
quality-of-life assessment
Ancillary studies
questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Judged by the study doctor to be a suitable candidate for a radical prostatectomy
* Serum prostate specific antigen equal to or less than 10 ng/mL
* Gleason score equal to or less than 7
* Life expectancy greater than 10 years
* Prostate size on trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) measurement less than 50 grams
* Favorable operative risk defined as American Society of Anesthesiology Score (ASA score) =\< 3
* Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document or have a surrogate with the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with prior history of pelvic fractures or hip replacement
* Large pelvic or intra-abdominal masses
* Any condition or history of illness or surgery that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the patient (e.g. significant cardiovascular conditions)
* Poor surgical risk (defined as American Society of Anesthesiology Score \> 3)
* Active infection
* Uncorrected coagulopathy
* Body mass index equal to or greater than 35
35 Years
72 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jihad Kaouk
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2014-00393
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CASE12811
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CASE12811
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.