Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy With or Without Pelvic Drain Placement in Reducing Adverse Events After Surgery in Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01613651
Last Updated: 2017-09-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
191 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-24
2017-09-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic vs Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03682146
Robotic Athermal Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy
NCT02079155
Robot-assisted vs Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Treatment
NCT04011865
Clinical Trial of Approaches to Prostate Cancer Surgery
NCT05155501
Study of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed on Outpatient in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT04319146
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To determine if eliminating placement of a pelvic drain in patients during robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) increases incidence of early postoperative adverse events occurring within 90 days from prostatectomy, compared to patients who have a pelvic drain placed during RALP.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the incidence of early postoperative adverse events in patients with and without a pelvic drain when adjustments to confounders associated with these events are made (confounders: demographic, surgical and pathologic; age, body mass index \[BMI\], pathologic stage, Gleason sum, extent of lymph node dissection).
II. To report peri-operative and postoperative outcomes, including but not limited to, length of hospital stay, re-admissions, continence, potency and incidence of medical interventions for patients with and without pelvic drain.
III. To compare early postoperative adverse event rates between patients with and without a pelvic drain in patients who had extended pelvic lymph node dissection during RALP.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients undergo RALP.
ARM II: Patients undergo RALP and placement of pelvic drain.
After completion of treatment, patients are followed up at 1 week and then 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (RALP)
Patients undergo RALP.
robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
Undergo RALP
questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies
Arm II (RALP and placement of pelvic drain)
Patients undergo RALP and placement of pelvic drain.
robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
Undergo RALP
questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies
intraoperative complication management/prevention
Undergo placement of pelvic drain
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
Undergo RALP
questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies
intraoperative complication management/prevention
Undergo placement of pelvic drain
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent obtained in accordance with institutional policies approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior radiotherapy to the pelvis or prostate
* Prior extensive pelvic surgery such as low anterior reception, abdomino-perineal resection, or proctocolectomy continent stool pouch, or any other extensive abdomino-pelvic surgery that would render the patient high-rick for complications as deemed by the surgeon
* Demonstrated intra-operative anastomotic leakage when irrigated with 120 mL of normal saline at the end of surgery
* Intra-operative injuries (for example: rectal injury)
* Inadequate hemostasis
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
City of Hope Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonathan Yamzon
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
City of Hope Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
City of Hope Medical Center
Duarte, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2012-00558
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
11113
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.