Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy With or Without Pelvic Drain Placement in Reducing Adverse Events After Surgery in Patients With Prostate Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01613651

Last Updated: 2017-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

191 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-24

Study Completion Date

2017-09-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized phase III trial studies robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with pelvic drain placement to see how well it works compared to RALP without pelvic drain replacement in reducing adverse events after surgery in patients with prostate cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if eliminating placement of a pelvic drain in patients during robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) increases incidence of early postoperative adverse events occurring within 90 days from prostatectomy, compared to patients who have a pelvic drain placed during RALP.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the incidence of early postoperative adverse events in patients with and without a pelvic drain when adjustments to confounders associated with these events are made (confounders: demographic, surgical and pathologic; age, body mass index \[BMI\], pathologic stage, Gleason sum, extent of lymph node dissection).

II. To report peri-operative and postoperative outcomes, including but not limited to, length of hospital stay, re-admissions, continence, potency and incidence of medical interventions for patients with and without pelvic drain.

III. To compare early postoperative adverse event rates between patients with and without a pelvic drain in patients who had extended pelvic lymph node dissection during RALP.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo RALP.

ARM II: Patients undergo RALP and placement of pelvic drain.

After completion of treatment, patients are followed up at 1 week and then 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Perioperative/Postoperative Complications Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I (RALP)

Patients undergo RALP.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo RALP

questionnaire administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Arm II (RALP and placement of pelvic drain)

Patients undergo RALP and placement of pelvic drain.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo RALP

questionnaire administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

intraoperative complication management/prevention

Intervention Type OTHER

Undergo placement of pelvic drain

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery

Undergo RALP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

questionnaire administration

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

intraoperative complication management/prevention

Undergo placement of pelvic drain

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and scheduled to undergo RALP at City of Hope National Medical Center
* Written informed consent obtained in accordance with institutional policies approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-compliance
* Prior radiotherapy to the pelvis or prostate
* Prior extensive pelvic surgery such as low anterior reception, abdomino-perineal resection, or proctocolectomy continent stool pouch, or any other extensive abdomino-pelvic surgery that would render the patient high-rick for complications as deemed by the surgeon
* Demonstrated intra-operative anastomotic leakage when irrigated with 120 mL of normal saline at the end of surgery
* Intra-operative injuries (for example: rectal injury)
* Inadequate hemostasis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

City of Hope Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jonathan Yamzon

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

City of Hope Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

City of Hope Medical Center

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2012-00558

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

11113

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Robotic Radical Perineal Prostatectomy Study
NCT04919057 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA