Economic Evaluation of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Conventional Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer: a Real-life Study Based on the French National Healthcare Data System (SNDS)
NCT ID: NCT04587284
Last Updated: 2020-10-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
84667 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-01-01
2023-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cost Efficacy Evaluation of Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT02784314
Medico-economic Comparison of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radical Prostatectomy Via Laparotomy
NCT01577836
Study of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed on Outpatient in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT04319146
Comparison of Radical Prostatectomy Performed by Robot-assisted Laparoscopy or Conventional Laparoscopy or by Laparotomy
NCT04638088
Prospective Comparative Study Evaluating the Early Complications of Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed as an Outpatient Versus an Inpatient Procedure.
NCT06822452
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
No interventions assigned to this group
Patients with open retropubic radical prostatectomy
No interventions assigned to this group
Patients with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Laparoscopic total prostatectomy (PTL) identified in the SNDS by the CCAM "JGFC001" act and the health and social establishment files number of centers not equipped with a surgical robot
* Robot-assisted total prostatectomy (PTRA) identified in the SNDS by the CCAM "JGFC001" act and the health and social establishment files number of centers equipped with a surgical robot for more than 12 months and having a rate of use of this technique for more than 95% minimally invasive prostatectomies. The number of PTRA will be identified by a survey in each center and the manufacturer's data as explained above
Patient who has not received previous treatment for this cancer by hormone therapy, radiotherapy, brachytherapy or HiFU (treatments sought in the SNDS prior to surgery by the prescription of pharmaceutical specialties or the presence of CCAM procedures)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient operated for a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a center having started a robotic activity for less than 12 months
Patient previously treated with another therapeutic modality for his prostate cancer (salvage prostatectomies after hormone therapy, radiotherapy, brachytherapy or HiFU)
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bordeaux PharmacoEpi
OTHER
University Hospital, Bordeaux
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux
Talence, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Robert G, Blin P, Bladou F, Jove J, Ouattara E, Rouyer M, Droz-Perroteau C, Piazza L, Preaubert N. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open prostatectomy: a real-life nationwide study. World J Urol. 2025 Jun 10;43(1):367. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05715-0.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHUBX 2018/72
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.