A Comparison of Totally Intravenous and Inhalation Anesthesia for Intraocular Pressure During Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

NCT ID: NCT01744262

Last Updated: 2016-08-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-05-31

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) has gained popularity during the past decade and has widely replaced conventional open prostatectomy in many institutions due to reduced blood loss, nerve sparing, less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay. However, laparoscopic surgery is performed with intraperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation, which leads to increased intraocular pressure (IOP). In particular, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) usually requires a steep Trendelenburg position and often prolonged insufflation times, which is known to effect the increase in IOP during surgery and may result in ophthalmic complications such as postoperative vision loss (POVL). The majority of patients undergoing RALRP is old aged and often present with comorbidities. Advanced age, underlying diabetes mellitus (DM) or hypertension renders the patient vulnerable to damage due to increased IOP. Moreover, the possibility of the patient having undiagnosed glaucoma is also increased, and therefore methods to prevent such complications are needed. As of now, intravenous hypnotic agents, inhalation anesthetics and opioids have been reported to decrease IOP by relaxing extraocular muscle tone and increasing aqueous humour outflow to some extent. Among these agents, propofol has been reported to be more effective than other inhalational anesthetics in decreasing IOP. The goal of this prospective, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of propofol and sevoflurane on IOP in patients undergoing RALRP in the steep Trendelenburg position with carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Inhalational anesthesia group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Inhalation Anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

Anesthesia induction with intravenous propofol bolus of 1.5\~2.5 mg/kg and remifentanil (effect site concentration 3 ng/mL)using target controlled infusion (TCI). Anesthesia maintenance with sevoflurane 1.5\~2.0 % and remifentanil effect site concentration 2\~5 ng/mL.

Total intravenous anesthesia group

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Total intravenous anesthesia

Intervention Type DRUG

Anesthesia induction with intravenous propofol (effect site concentration 2.5 µg/mL) and remifentanil (effect site concentration 3 ng/mL) using target controlled infusion (TCI). Anesthesia maintenance with propofol effect site concentration 1.5\~4 µg/mL and remifentanil effect site concentration 2\~5 ng/mL.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Total intravenous anesthesia

Anesthesia induction with intravenous propofol (effect site concentration 2.5 µg/mL) and remifentanil (effect site concentration 3 ng/mL) using target controlled infusion (TCI). Anesthesia maintenance with propofol effect site concentration 1.5\~4 µg/mL and remifentanil effect site concentration 2\~5 ng/mL.

Intervention Type DRUG

Inhalation Anesthesia

Anesthesia induction with intravenous propofol bolus of 1.5\~2.5 mg/kg and remifentanil (effect site concentration 3 ng/mL)using target controlled infusion (TCI). Anesthesia maintenance with sevoflurane 1.5\~2.0 % and remifentanil effect site concentration 2\~5 ng/mL.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. ASA class 1 or 2
2. Adults over the age of 20 and under 70
3. Patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
4. Patients that have given informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with known ophthalmic diseases (glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, cataract, retinal detachment)
2. Patients with history of ophthalmic surgery
3. Patients with high baseline intraocular pressure (over 30 mmHg)
4. Patients with active cardiac conditions (unstable angina, congestive heart failure)
5. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension (diastolic blood pressure \> 110 mmHg)
6. Patients with history of allergic reactions to propofol
7. Illiterate patients
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yonsei University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yoo YC, Shin S, Choi EK, Kim CY, Choi YD, Bai SJ. Increase in intraocular pressure is less with propofol than with sevoflurane during laparoscopic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position. Can J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;61(4):322-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0112-2. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24500661 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

4-2011-0034

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.