PSMA-PET/MRI-Ultrasound Multimodal Fusion Navigation for Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT07272317

Last Updated: 2025-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-15

Study Completion Date

2026-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Radical prostatectomy faces the core dilemma of balancing functional preservation with tumor eradication. While nerve-sparing techniques improve urinary control, intraoperative tumor localization remains imprecise, resulting in positive surgical margin (PSM) rates of 11%-38% and elevated recurrence risk. Traditional preoperative 2D imaging fails to dynamically guide surgical boundaries. Although multimodal fusion studies (e.g., MRI or PSMA-PET/CT) attempt to address this, they struggle to achieve simultaneous precision in lesion identification and real-time spatial tracking. This study pioneers a PSMA-PET/MRI-ultrasound multimodal fusion navigation system for the Da Vinci surgical robot, leveraging three innovations: PSMA-PET/MRI dual-modality synergy for subclinical lesion detection at millimeter resolution; Non-rigid point-cloud registration algorithms to dynamically compensate for intraoperative prostate deformation, enabling 3D ultrasound-PET/MRI elastic fusion; Utilizing the telipro port of the Da Vinci surgical robot to achieve intraoperative picture-in-picture navigation, real-time localization of the tumor boundary, and precise resection as well as precise protection.This study aims to verify the safety and effectiveness of the world's first PSMA-PET/MRI-ultrasound multimodal fusion navigation system adapted for the Da Vinci surgical robot. This system is expected to reduce the positive margin rate to less than 10%, increase the rate of nerve preservation by 30%, shorten the postoperative urinary control recovery time to within 2 weeks, and establish a standard process for robotic surgery navigation. This will provide a new paradigm for precise surgical treatment of prostate cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prostate cancer, the second most prevalent malignancy in men globally, has long grappled with a core dilemma in radical surgery: balancing functional preservation against oncological efficacy. Although nerve-sparing techniques significantly improve postoperative urinary control and sexual function (with robotic surgery achieving \>80% continence recovery rates), conventional approaches relying on intraoperative visual tumor boundary assessment result in positive surgical margin (PSM) rates of 11%- 38%, increasing biochemical recurrence risk exceeding 40% \[1,2\]. For locally advanced cases, sacrificing functional structures to ensure oncological radicality leads to postoperative erectile dysfunction rates up to 95% and urinary incontinence exceeding 50% \[3\].The essence of this conflict lies in: Extended resection reduces PSM rates but damages neurovascular bundles (NVBs) governing micturition and erectile function; Limited resection preserves function yet increases PSM risk due to residual microlesions-particularly in anatomically complex zones like the prostatic apex and anterior wall, where visual localization errors typically exceed 3 mm.

Preoperative imaging limitations exacerbate this: MRI offers high anatomical resolution (0.5 mm³) but cannot track intraoperative organ deformation; PSMA-PET/CT detects micrometastases with 98% sensitivity, yet spatial registration errors between metabolic/anatomical data exceed 2 mm \[4\]. Current multimodal fusion approaches are inadequate: MRI-based fusion misses early-stage lesions due to limited tumor contrast; PSMA-PET/CT fusion suffers from metabolic-anatomical misalignment.

Thus, a navigation system enabling simultaneous subclinical lesion detection and dynamic deformation compensation is imperative to resolve the function-versus-curability dilemma.

We have adopted the following approaches to complete the construction of the intraoperative navigation system: (1) On the PET/MRI before the operation, the prostate and the lesion were delineated: at least two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed the images and then provided a unified report; the external contour of the prostate and the three-dimensional lesion schematic diagram of the lesion were then delineated by a urologist; (2) On the intraoperative ultrasound, the prostate was delineated: the prostate image was captured in real time by BK ultrasound and then the external contour of the prostate was delineated by a urologist; (3) The multimodal fusion of the three-dimensional lesion delineated by BK ultrasound and PSMAPET/MRI was achieved through the MIM software built into the BK ultrasound; (4) The intraoperative resection was guided by the Da Vinci Tilepro functional module. So far, 6 cases have been successfully completed and compared with 6 T3a patients randomly selected from previous conventional surgeries. Currently, due to the small sample size, although the differences in the surgical margins have not reached a statistically significant difference, a trend of difference has been demonstrated. Due to the short follow-up period, the postoperative PSA and urination conditionshave not been included in the statistical cohort.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study is a single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. The research subjects are patients with T3a or T2 (with the lesion close to the surface of the prostate) prostate cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in our hospital. The subjects were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group. Patients in the control group received RARP according to the conventional method, while patients in the experimental group underwent preoperative PSMA-PET/MRI-ultrasound multimodal fusion and RARP under real-time navigation assistance during the operation.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

experimental group(navigation-assisted RARP)

The experimental group will use preoperative PSMA-PET/MRI and intraoperative ultrasound for multimodal fusion to construct a three-dimensional model and synchronize it in real time to the surgeon's control console through the Da Vinci surgical robot's Tilepro video integration module, and complete the anterior approach laparoscopic radical prostatectomy under this guidance.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

experimental group (navigation-assisted RARP)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Before the surgery, the prostate and lesions were delineated on PET/MRI: at least two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed the images and provided a unified report. The experimental group had the external contour of the prostate and the three-dimensional lesion schematic diagram delineated by the urologist. A BK5000 ultrasound probe was inserted into the rectum, the probe was fixed to the surgical bed frame by the stepper, and the real-time images of the prostate were captured by the ultrasound.The multimodal fusion of the three-dimensional lesion outlined by ultrasound and PSMA-PET/MRI was achieved through the built-in MIM software. Subsequently, picture-in-picture guidance was realized through the Da Vinci Tilepro functional module, and the edge of the lesion was marked with titanium clips. After the ultrasound probe was withdrawn, the peripheral resection of the prostate, nerve preserve or not were completed under the guidance of the titanium clips.

Control group (traditional RARP)

The control group will undergo the anterior approach laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the conventional manner.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

experimental group (navigation-assisted RARP)

Before the surgery, the prostate and lesions were delineated on PET/MRI: at least two nuclear medicine physicians independently reviewed the images and provided a unified report. The experimental group had the external contour of the prostate and the three-dimensional lesion schematic diagram delineated by the urologist. A BK5000 ultrasound probe was inserted into the rectum, the probe was fixed to the surgical bed frame by the stepper, and the real-time images of the prostate were captured by the ultrasound.The multimodal fusion of the three-dimensional lesion outlined by ultrasound and PSMA-PET/MRI was achieved through the built-in MIM software. Subsequently, picture-in-picture guidance was realized through the Da Vinci Tilepro functional module, and the edge of the lesion was marked with titanium clips. After the ultrasound probe was withdrawn, the peripheral resection of the prostate, nerve preserve or not were completed under the guidance of the titanium clips.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Target Population: Patients with clinical stage T3a, or T2 (with the lesion close to the surface of the prostate) scheduled for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer.

* Age 50 - 80 years old;

* Pathologically confirmed as prostate adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 6 - 10);

* PSMA-PET/MRI indicates extracapsular invasion of the lesion; ④ Signed informed consent and committed to completing follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

* ① Metastasis (M1 stage) or lymph node metastasis (N1 stage);

* Previous pelvic radiotherapy or endocrine therapy history;

* Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction (ASA grade ≥ III); ④ Mental illness or cognitive impairment that cannot cooperate with assessment; ⑤ Participating in other interventional clinical trials.
Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Liu Cheng

Chief Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shanghai General Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Cheng Liu, Doctor

Role: CONTACT

+8618663760823

Jing Zhao, Doctor

Role: CONTACT

+8618101917512

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jing Zhao, Doctor

Role: primary

+8618101917512

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sivarajan G, Prabhu V, Taksler GB, Laze J, Lepor H. Ten-year outcomes of sexual function after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Aug 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24007711 (View on PubMed)

Bakht MK, Beltran H. Biological determinants of PSMA expression, regulation and heterogeneity in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2025 Jan;22(1):26-45. doi: 10.1038/s41585-024-00900-z. Epub 2024 Jul 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38977769 (View on PubMed)

Zhang L, Wu B, Zha Z, Zhao H, Jiang Y, Yuan J. Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies. World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul 3;16(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1433-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29970100 (View on PubMed)

Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.029. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22405509 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Y2025082

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

【2025】177

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.