Perineal Ultrasound in Men Before and After Radical Prostatectomy

NCT ID: NCT03037008

Last Updated: 2020-04-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-01

Study Completion Date

2020-02-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective study to evaluate a new technique. Comparison of perineal sonography in men before and after radical prostatectomy and in incontinent men after radical prostatectomy before and after operative treatment with male sling and comparison with pre- and postoperative functional MRI

Inclusion / Exclusion criteria: Inclusion: male, elder than 18years, planned RALP or history of RALP and PPSUI (Post Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence).

Exclusion: Patients with history of urinary incontinence before radical prostatectomy. Patients with history of radiotherapy in the pelvis. Other diseases involving pelvic floor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After radical prostatectomy, a part of all patients suffer from urinary incontinence. Until now, only few information exists about the functional anatomy of the male pelvic floor, especially in incontinent men. Transperineal ultrasound is non-hazardous, cheap and easy available method to visualize the pelvic floor and is well established in gynecological examination. literature described the technique of transperineal ultrasound but there are no well established reference lines measured and the number of examined men in the series are small. The investigators want to confirm the published data and probably find new reference lines/parameters, e.g. the distance between the posterior wall of the symphysis to the posterior wall of the urethra in a direct, horizontal line. At the moment, the authors published data about urethral mobility, bladder neck opening and urethral angle. The investigators estimate that there is also a possible significant difference in the distance from the urethra to the symphysis in incontinent men compare to continent men after radical prostatectomy.

Incontinent men can be treated by pelvic floor exercises or, in case of persisting incontinence, with operative treatment. There exists several techniques of implanted slings and meshes, similar to the better known TVT (tension free vaginal tape) in female urinary incontinence, besides the gold standard - the implantation of an artificial sphincter prosthesis. The sling-operations are less invasive, cheaper and preferred by patients du to the fact, that normal micturition is still possible. Nevertheless, around 20% of patients stay incontinent after sling operation. At the moment, it is unknown why they do not profit from the sling. In a previous study functional pelvic cine-MRI in patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence before and after implantation of a bulbourethral composite Suspension were compared. The investigators could find significant differences in the membranous urethral length and could show an elevation oft he bladder neck postoperatively but no significant MRI differences were found between patients showing clinical success or failure. With perineal sonography, the investigators want to establish a prediction tool for sling-operations in patients with urinary stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether perineal ultrasound in men is an adequate possibility to evaluate the pelvic floor and its function in the regard of urinary incontinence. The study is trying to find a prediction tool for bulbourethral composite suspension (sling-operation) using transperineal sonography. The investigators further want to establish and confirm parameters/standards to measure the male pelvic floor with the new technique of perineal sonography in men. Further the investigators want to to compare findings from perineal sonography with data from functional MRI in men with urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy before and after bulbourethral composite suspension. Findings from perineal sonography with results from questionnaires concerning quality of life will be compared.

There is a comparison study with two arms to compare the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor with perineal ultrasound from men prior to RALP due to prostate cancer, without prior history of diseases involving the pelvic floor.

Participants will be asked to participate the study during routine consultations in the department of Kantonsspital Winterthur or selected in our database of the clinical information system searching for radical prostatectomies in the past and recruit these participants by telephone.

In a modified lithotomy position (supine position with elevated legs), probands will get an examination of their pelvic floor by using a common ultrasound probe head on the perineum. During the examination, the bladder should be filled with around 300ml. If patient appear with empty bladder, the examination can be repeated on an other date. During the examination, the pelvic floor is observed during rest, coughing and valsalva-maneuver. One examination takes around 30minutes. During ultrasound, the investigators want to illustrate the urethral mobility, the bladder neck opening and the urethral angle as well as the distance from the urethra to the symphysis.

Urinary incontinence is measured by 24h pad test: Probands have to collect their pads, and scale them before and after using it during 24 hours, to measure the difference. The difference (after-before) shows the amount of lost urine. The results don't have to be exact and a result with a precision of approximately 50ml (= 50g) is acceptable.

Results from urinary analysis (culture) are taken out of medical history from the hospitals database during the period of incontinence to exclude urinary tract infection. If no data is available, urinary analysis will be collected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

continent men after RALP

perineal sonography, questionnaires, 24h pad tests

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Perineal Sonography

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a modified lithotomy position (supine position with elevated legs), probands will get an examination of their pelvic floor by using a common ultrasound probe head on the perineum. During the examination, the bladder should be filled with around 300ml. If patient appear with empty bladder, the examination can be repeated on an other date. During the examination, the pelvic floor will be observed during rest, coughing and valsalva-maneuver. One examination takes around 30minutes. During ultrasound, we want to illustrate the urethral mobility, the bladder neck opening and the urethral angle as well as the distance from the urethra to the symphysis.

incontinent men after RALP

perineal sonography, questionnaires, 24h pad tests

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Perineal Sonography

Intervention Type DEVICE

In a modified lithotomy position (supine position with elevated legs), probands will get an examination of their pelvic floor by using a common ultrasound probe head on the perineum. During the examination, the bladder should be filled with around 300ml. If patient appear with empty bladder, the examination can be repeated on an other date. During the examination, the pelvic floor will be observed during rest, coughing and valsalva-maneuver. One examination takes around 30minutes. During ultrasound, we want to illustrate the urethral mobility, the bladder neck opening and the urethral angle as well as the distance from the urethra to the symphysis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Perineal Sonography

In a modified lithotomy position (supine position with elevated legs), probands will get an examination of their pelvic floor by using a common ultrasound probe head on the perineum. During the examination, the bladder should be filled with around 300ml. If patient appear with empty bladder, the examination can be repeated on an other date. During the examination, the pelvic floor will be observed during rest, coughing and valsalva-maneuver. One examination takes around 30minutes. During ultrasound, we want to illustrate the urethral mobility, the bladder neck opening and the urethral angle as well as the distance from the urethra to the symphysis.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Perineal Ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male,
* Elder than 18years
* Planned RALP or history of RALP and PPSUI

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with history of urinary incontinence before radical prostatectomy.
* Patients with history of radiotherapy in the pelvis.
* Other diseases involving pelvic floor.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kantonsspital Winterthur KSW

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hubert John, Prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Head of Kantonsspital Winterthur Urology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kantonsspital Winterthur

Winterthur, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-00054

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.