Evaluation of the Effect of Endoscopic Urethral Procedures Applied After Radical Prostatectomy on Urinary Incontinence
NCT ID: NCT04924218
Last Updated: 2021-06-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-11-15
2021-05-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of the Efficacy of Perineal and Anal Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT06669468
Electrical Stimulation in Men With Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT05236140
A Technique Improves Urinary Continence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT06754488
Bladder Training in Radical Prostatectomy
NCT04628351
The Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Urinary Incontinence After Prostatectomy
NCT05236088
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: Eighteen patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the endoscopic device used: group 1 rigid cystoscopy, group 2 flexible cystoscopy, and group 3 semi-rigid ureterorenoscopy (URS). The Turkish version of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and the number of pads used daily was questioned before the endoscopic procedure and 1 month after the procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
rigid cystoscopy
Group undergoing endoscopic urethral procedure with rigid cystoscopy after radical prostatectomy
endoscopic surgical intervention
The researchers investigated whether endoscopic surgical procedures performed due to various indications (hematuria, urinary tract stone, suspected bladder mass) in the patient group who had undergone radical prostatectomy, caused a change in urinary incontinence level. The researchers divided the endoscopic instruments used into 3 groups and evaluated whether there was a difference in urinary incontinence level between rigid cystoscope, flexible cystoscope and ureterorenoscope groups.
flexible cystoscopy
Group undergoing endoscopic urethral procedure with flexible cystoscopy after radical prostatectomy
endoscopic surgical intervention
The researchers investigated whether endoscopic surgical procedures performed due to various indications (hematuria, urinary tract stone, suspected bladder mass) in the patient group who had undergone radical prostatectomy, caused a change in urinary incontinence level. The researchers divided the endoscopic instruments used into 3 groups and evaluated whether there was a difference in urinary incontinence level between rigid cystoscope, flexible cystoscope and ureterorenoscope groups.
semi-rigid ureterorenoscopy
Group undergoing endoscopic urethral procedure with semi-rigid ureterorenoscopy after radical prostatectomy
endoscopic surgical intervention
The researchers investigated whether endoscopic surgical procedures performed due to various indications (hematuria, urinary tract stone, suspected bladder mass) in the patient group who had undergone radical prostatectomy, caused a change in urinary incontinence level. The researchers divided the endoscopic instruments used into 3 groups and evaluated whether there was a difference in urinary incontinence level between rigid cystoscope, flexible cystoscope and ureterorenoscope groups.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
endoscopic surgical intervention
The researchers investigated whether endoscopic surgical procedures performed due to various indications (hematuria, urinary tract stone, suspected bladder mass) in the patient group who had undergone radical prostatectomy, caused a change in urinary incontinence level. The researchers divided the endoscopic instruments used into 3 groups and evaluated whether there was a difference in urinary incontinence level between rigid cystoscope, flexible cystoscope and ureterorenoscope groups.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients that had undergone an endoscopic procedure 1 year after RP
Exclusion Criteria
* Urinary tract infection at 1st month follow-up
* Central neurological deficit
* History of adjuvant radiotherapy after RP
* Bladder neck stenosis and urethral stenosis
* Patients that had undergone endoscopic urethral intervention before this scheduled procedure
* Patients who had a double J stent inserted during the endoscopic procedure and required a second endoscopic intervention
* Patients that required the use of bipolar or monopolar cautery
52 Years
84 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
selman unal
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Onder Kayigil, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Schhol of Medicine
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AnkaraYBU-URO-SU-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.