Predictor of Early Recovery on Urinary Continence After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT ID: NCT03097367
Last Updated: 2017-04-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
48 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-01-31
2017-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Technique Improves Urinary Continence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
NCT06754488
Effect of New Posterior Reconstruction Method on Recovery of Continence After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
NCT01714219
Trial Study of the Efficacy of Intensive Preoperative Pelvic Floor Muscle Training to Decrease Post-prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence
NCT01338584
Effects of Urinary Bladder Hypertrophy on Urge Urine Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03061760
Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT05625048
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Definite evaluation for the voiding function has been recommended for patients with prolonged post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI). To improve quality of life after LRP, early recovery of urinary continence is an important concern for patients. Several studies have investigated the predictive factors of early recovery of urinary continence after prostatectomy, including the amount of urine loss after catheter removal, pelvic floor muscle function, a nerve-sparing technique, and the membranous urethral length loss ratio.
Other factors relating to the early recovery of urinary continence include post-operative anatomy of the lower urinary tract, such as the length of the membranous urethra and the level of the vesicourethral junction. However, there has been no consensus on the standard criteria that should be used to measure the structural changes, and the relationship between the urodynamic change and the anatomical morphology remains unclear. In this study, investigators study the relationship between the urodynamic parameters and the bladder neck levels after LRP, and their effects on the early recovery of urinary incontinence.
This study was a retrospective analysis. From 2011 to 2014, a total of 48 consecutive patients with localized prostatic cancer underwent LRP in single medical center by two experienced surgeons. Videourodynamic study was performed before operation (baseline) and at 3 and 6 months after operation. The Ethics Committee of the hospital approved this study and written informed consent was waived because the study was a retrospective analysis. The principles of Helsinki Declaration were followed throughout the study.
The urodynamic parameters were measured and recorded including first sensation of filling (FSF), maximum flow rate (Qmax), detrusor pressure at Qmax (PdetQmax), voided volume, cystometric bladder capacity (CBC), bladder compliance, post-void residual (PVR) volume, maximal urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and functional profile length (FPL). The urodynamic parameters were compared between baseline and different time-points after LRP.
The BN level was evaluated by retrograde cystography, which was routinely performed 7 to 14 days after LRP to evaluate the condition of anastomosis. The image was obtained anteroposteriorly after infusing 100-150 mL of contrast solution into the bladder while the patient was in standing position. The distance between the bladder neck and the superior margin of the symphysis pubis (SMSP) was then measured by the same urologist. The bladder neck level was graded on a three-point scale: a bladder neck level at or above the SMSP was marked as level 0, a bladder neck level with a distance less than 2 cm below the SMSP was marked as level -1, and bladder neck levels 2 or more cm below the SMSP was labeled as level -2.
The patient's urinary continence status was evaluated on direct visits and via questionnaires during follow-up periods at 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively. Patients without urine leakage in their daily life and those who used only one pad per day for safety reasons without limitation in their daily activities were defined as "urinary continent". Otherwise, the patients were defined as "urinary incontinent". Regaining continence within 3 months after LRP was considered early recovery of urinary continence.
The data was collected retrospectively by chart review. The variables among continent and incontinent patients were evaluated by univariate analysis (t-test for continuous variables and Chi-square for categorical variables ). The ANOVA test was use to compare the urodynamic parameters between different BN levels. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 statistical software.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
bladder neck level on cystography
All patients had investigated by retrograde cystography after LRP and were grouped according their bladder neck position: Level 0: bladder neck at or above the superior margin of the symphysis pubis (SMSP), Level -1: bladder neck at \<2 cm below SMSP, and Level -2: bladder neck at \>2 cm below SMSP.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
40 Years
90 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hann-Chorng Kuo
Chaiman, Department of Urology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
HannChorng Kuo, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TCGH106-42-B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.