Effects of Transcutaneous Perineal Stimulation Versus Anal Stimulation
NCT ID: NCT03587402
Last Updated: 2020-10-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-01
2020-10-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Half of participants will receive a treatment with surface perineal stimulation, while the other half will receive a treatment with anal stimulation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT05625048
Effect of Radical Prostatectomy on Involuntary Pelvic Floor Muscle Contraction
NCT03574298
Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03721029
Perineal Ultrasound in Men Before and After Radical Prostatectomy
NCT03037008
Prevention of Urinary Incontinence After Prostatectomy
NCT00982098
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The perineal stimulation can be applied with surface electrodes or with an intra-cavitary probe placed in the anus. The two techniques are commonly used. Each techniques stimulates different anatomical points of perineum, and it is a question if both have the same effectiveness or, one of the two techniques has greater effect than the other.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Transcutaneous perineal stimulation
Patient is asked to lie down with legs slightly bend and two adhesive electrodes are attached transcutaneous on base of penis and on perineum. Stimulation current is administrated half time with a fixed frequency of 30 Hz and half time with 50 Hz. Pulse increased until the patient perceives the current. Sessions lasted for 30 minutes weekly for 10 weeks.
Transcutaneous perineal stimulation
Surface stimulation
Anal stimulation
Patient is asked to lie down with legs slightly bend and an electrical probe is inserted into the anus. Stimulation current is administrated half time with a fixed frequency of 30 Hz and half time with 50 Hz. Pulse increased until the patient perceives the current. Sessions lasted for 30 minutes weekly for 10 weeks.
Anal stimulation
Intra-cavitary stimulation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcutaneous perineal stimulation
Surface stimulation
Anal stimulation
Intra-cavitary stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presenting involuntary urine losses after radical prostatectomy intervention. (IU grade I, II or III)
* Do not exceed the year since the surgical intervention.
* Accept to participate in the study and grant signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Presenting anatomical malformations of the pelvic floor musculature.
* Carry pacemaker.
* Present anal fistulas.
* suffer from serious psychic disorders.
* Presenting lower urinary tract infections.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
RAPbarcelona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Regina Pané Alemany
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Regina Pané
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
RAPbarcelona
Inés Ramírez
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
RAPbarcelona
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Regina Pané Alemany
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pane-Alemany R, Ramirez-Garcia I, Carralero-Martinez A, Blanco-Ratto L, Kauffmann S, Sanchez E. Efficacy of transcutaneous perineal electrostimulation versus intracavitary anal electrostimulation in the treatment of urinary incontinence after a radical prostatectomy: randomized controlled trial study protocol. BMC Urol. 2021 Jan 28;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00718-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RAP47747176G
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.