Tooth Discoloration and Chairside Handling Time (Bonding-Debonding) in Flowable Versus Packable Composites for Clear Aligner Bonded Attachments: A Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT07234149

Last Updated: 2025-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-15

Study Completion Date

2026-12-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized split-mouth clinical trial aims to compare two different composite materials used for bonding attachments in clear aligner orthodontic therapy. Twenty adult participants with Class I malocclusion and mild crowding will receive flowable nanocomposite attachments on one side of the dental arch and packable microhybrid composite attachments on the opposite side. The primary outcome is the color change (ΔE) of the enamel surface after attachment removal, measured by a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade). Secondary outcomes include bonding and debonding time and changes in enamel surface roughness before and after treatment. The study will be conducted at the Orthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani. The goal is to determine which composite material provides better color stability, easier handling, and minimal impact on enamel surface characteristics during clear aligner therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Clear aligner therapy has become a popular alternative to conventional fixed orthodontic appliances due to its superior esthetics and comfort. However, the efficiency of aligner treatment often depends on the proper use of composite attachments that enhance tooth movement and retention. Different composite resins are used for this purpose, but their optical stability and effect on enamel integrity after removal remain concerns.

This prospective, split-mouth randomized clinical trial compares a flowable nanocomposite and a packable microhybrid composite used for clear aligner attachments. Each participant will receive both materials in opposite quadrants to minimize inter-individual variability. Outcomes will include enamel color change (ΔE CIE Lab\* values), bonding/debonding time, and surface roughness assessment using digital and optical analysis methods.

The study hypothesis is that the flowable nanocomposite will exhibit superior color stability and faster handling time, with comparable enamel surface effects to the packable composite. Results from this trial may help establish standardized protocols for attachment material selection in clinical orthodontic practice.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Clear Aligner Orthodontic Treatment Composite Attachment Color Stability of Enamel

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Split-mouth randomized clinical trial in which each participant receives both interventions on opposite quadrants.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Single-blind design: the outcome assessor will be blinded to the type of composite used on each quadrant.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

packable microcomposite (Group A)

Participants will receive packable microcomposite attachments (e.g., GC G-ænial Universal ) on one side of the dental arc attachments on one quadrant of the dental arch for clear aligner therapy. Color change, bonding/debonding time, and enamel roughness will be assessed

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Packable Microhybrid Composite Resin

Intervention Type DEVICE

Packable microhybrid composite resin used to fabricate clear aligner attachments.

flowable nanohybrid Composite (Group B)

Participants will receive flowable nanocomposite (e.g., GC aligner connect ) attachments on the opposite quadrant of the same dental arch.Color change, bonding/debonding time, and enamel roughness will be assessed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

flowable nanohybrid Composite Resin

Intervention Type DEVICE

A flowable nanocomposite (e.g., GC aligne connect) used to fabricate clear aligner attachments on enamel surfaces for comparison

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

flowable nanohybrid Composite Resin

A flowable nanocomposite (e.g., GC aligne connect) used to fabricate clear aligner attachments on enamel surfaces for comparison

Intervention Type DEVICE

Packable Microhybrid Composite Resin

Packable microhybrid composite resin used to fabricate clear aligner attachments.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

packable microhybrid composite

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults 18-40 years.
* patients with class l malocclusion with in which there treatment will be completed in 6 month .
* Completed clear aligner therapy and scheduled for attachment debonding at the study clinic.
* Permanent teeth with intact buccal enamel at assessment sites.
* No caries, restorations, cracks, fluorosis, or hypoplasia on assessed surfaces.
* No bleaching within 6 months prior to baseline.
* Good general health (ASA I-II) and able to provide written informed consent.
* Satisfactory oral hygiene and gingival health (e.g., GI ≤ 1).
* Willing and able to complete measurements: spectrophotometric shade (CIE L\*, a\*, b\*), photographs/scans, and VAS for pain/discomfort.
* Available for all visits and follow-up assessment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients younger than 18 or older than 40 years.
* Patients presenting with severe or very severe anterior crowding (LII \> 6 mm) or spacing will exclude from the study. Cases with posterior crossbites, open bites, or skeletal discrepancies
* Presence of systemic diseases (ASA \> II) that may affect healing, pain perception, or enamel quality.
* Teeth with caries, restorations, fractures, enamel cracks, fluorosis, hypoplasia, or discolorations on the buccal surfaces at assessment sites.
* Patients who have undergone tooth bleaching within the last 6 months.
* History of major dental surgery or trauma in the study region.
* Patients with poor oral hygiene or gingival inflammation (GI \> 1).
* Pregnant or lactating women.
* Patients with allergy or hypersensitivity to composite resins or dental adhesives.
* Individuals unable to provide informed consent or not willing to comply with study visits.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sulaimani

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Elaf Hussein Hasan

MSc Student in Orthodontics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ali I Ibrahim

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

College of Dentistry, University of Sulaimani.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Private Orthodontic Clinic - Kirkuk

Kirkuk, Kirkuk Governorate, Iraq

Site Status RECRUITING

Private Orthodontic Clinic - Kirkuk

Kirkuk, Province, Iraq

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Iraq

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Elaf Hussein Hasan H Hasan, BSD

Role: CONTACT

+9647715671612

. Hadi Mohammad M Ismail, PHD

Role: CONTACT

+9647702106211

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Elaf H Hasan, BSD,MSD candidate

Role: primary

+9647715671612

Elaf H Hasan, BSD,MSD candidate

Role: primary

+9647715671612

Hadi M Ismail, PHD

Role: backup

+9647702106211

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lin S, Huang L, Li J, Wen J, Mei L, Xu H, Zhang L, Li H. Assessment of preparation time and 1-year Invisalign aligner attachment survival using flowable and packable composites. Angle Orthod. 2021 Sep 1;91(5):583-589. doi: 10.2319/063020-598.1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33848325 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MSc-Ortho-Aligner-Study-2025;

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

USulaimani-Ortho-Aligner-2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.