Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness and Apical Root Resorption Changes Associated With Self-ligating Versus Conventional Brackets

NCT ID: NCT02816489

Last Updated: 2016-06-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets.

The aim of this study will be to compare labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets.

Protocol submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements of Master Degree in Orthodontics.

The initial stage of treatment crowding permanent teeth orthodontically is worried about teeth leveling and alignment. The accuracy of this procedure depends on various variables.

Friction is generated upon the materialistic composition of different bracket and archwire types, and the technique of ligature between them.

Several self-ligating brackets have been grown since 1935. Self-ligation doesn't need for an elastomeric attachment to catch the archwire, so it is related with a highly reduced friction with many different types of archwires, therefore less force required.

It is valuable to evaluate any appliance system for its capability to align teeth with minimal injurious effects to the oral tissues.

The aim of this study will be to compare labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets.

Subjects and method

Study design:

Randomized controlled clinical trial

Study setting and population:

The sample of this study will be consisted of twenty one patients selected from Outpatient Clinic, Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University.

Interventions:

The patients will be divided randomly into two groups and will be treated separately as follows:

* Group I: will be treated using passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner.
* Group II: will be treated using conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature.

The patients will be treated orthodontically within the initial leveling and alignment for the 6 month duration beginning with the same sequence of 0.014, 0.016, 0.016 × 0.022 inch nickel-titanium archwires and 0.016 × 0.022 inch stainless-steel archwire. Each archwire will be remained for 1.5 months, and it will be replaced with the previously mentioned sequence. For group II, the archwires will be attached to the brackets by using an elastomeric ligature. CBCT will be obtained in two time intervals, before beginning the orthodontic treatment and 6 months after it. Dental stripping and extraction of premolars will be eliminated.

Records:

For all patients the following records will be taken before and after leveling and alignment:

1. Standardized upper and lower study casts.
2. Standardized periapical radiograph.
3. Standardized extra-oral and intra-oral photographs.
4. Standardized cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Observations:

Sagittal cuts of upper and lower incisors in the center of the long axis will be selected. The labial alveolar bone thickness (LABT) of each incisor will be determined at the site neighboring to the widest point of the labiopalatal root in two levels separated by 3 mm (L1 and L2, respectively); these levels will be set along the long axis of the incisor and located every 3 mm from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) level. Labial alveolar bone thickness will be assessed at the cervical level (L1) and midroot level (L2) at T0 and T1. Furthermore, the apical root resorption (ARR) will be calculated by determining the difference in the total tooth length, which will be measured in millimeters from the incisal border to the root apex, between T0 and T1 (T1-T0).

Ethical consideration:

All patients will receive information about the future clinical trial study and give their consent by signing an informed consent.

Data management and analysis: All statistical analysis will be performed with SPSS software. Differences will be considered significant at P values less than 0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness Apical Root Resorption

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I

will be treated using passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner (3M Unitek - USA).

Intervention: Device: passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner (3M Unitek - USA).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clarity SL MBT brackets; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA

Intervention Type DEVICE

(passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner)

Group II

will be treated using conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature (3M Unitek - USA).

Intervention: Device: conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature (3M Unitek - USA).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gemini MBT brackets; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA

Intervention Type DEVICE

(conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clarity SL MBT brackets; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA

(passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Gemini MBT brackets; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA

(conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Clarity SL Gemini

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ranged between 14-20 years.
2. Complete permanent dentition (excluding third molars).
3. Angle Class I malocclusion.
4. Crowding anteriorly ranging from 2 to 4 mm.
5. Healthy young patients.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with signs of apical root resorption detected at the first examination by periapical radiographs.
2. Blocked-out or High-up canines.
3. Patients who went to previous orthodontic treatment.
4. Evidence of periodontal or gingival problems.
5. Endodontic treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Al Mansurah, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dr. Shaza M. Hammad, Associate Professor

Role: CONTACT

00201014910066

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nader Giacaman, Master student

Role: primary

00201100769353

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

9046380

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.