Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness and Apical Root Resorption Changes Associated With Self-ligating Versus Conventional Brackets
NCT ID: NCT02816489
Last Updated: 2016-06-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study will be to compare labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Labial and Lingual Orthodontic Appliances on Root Resorption and Bone Height
NCT06401369
Treatment of Crowding Without Extraction Using Self Ligating Brackets
NCT02996292
Comparison of Arch Expansion Changes Between Passive Self-ligating and Conventional Brackets
NCT03363620
Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Different Commercial Bracket Brands
NCT05333094
A Comparative CT Evaluation of the Amount of Root Resorption in Self-ligating Versus Conventional Brackets
NCT03613285
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Protocol submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements of Master Degree in Orthodontics.
The initial stage of treatment crowding permanent teeth orthodontically is worried about teeth leveling and alignment. The accuracy of this procedure depends on various variables.
Friction is generated upon the materialistic composition of different bracket and archwire types, and the technique of ligature between them.
Several self-ligating brackets have been grown since 1935. Self-ligation doesn't need for an elastomeric attachment to catch the archwire, so it is related with a highly reduced friction with many different types of archwires, therefore less force required.
It is valuable to evaluate any appliance system for its capability to align teeth with minimal injurious effects to the oral tissues.
The aim of this study will be to compare labial alveolar bone thickness and apical root resorption changes associated with self-ligating versus conventional brackets.
Subjects and method
Study design:
Randomized controlled clinical trial
Study setting and population:
The sample of this study will be consisted of twenty one patients selected from Outpatient Clinic, Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University.
Interventions:
The patients will be divided randomly into two groups and will be treated separately as follows:
* Group I: will be treated using passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner.
* Group II: will be treated using conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature.
The patients will be treated orthodontically within the initial leveling and alignment for the 6 month duration beginning with the same sequence of 0.014, 0.016, 0.016 × 0.022 inch nickel-titanium archwires and 0.016 × 0.022 inch stainless-steel archwire. Each archwire will be remained for 1.5 months, and it will be replaced with the previously mentioned sequence. For group II, the archwires will be attached to the brackets by using an elastomeric ligature. CBCT will be obtained in two time intervals, before beginning the orthodontic treatment and 6 months after it. Dental stripping and extraction of premolars will be eliminated.
Records:
For all patients the following records will be taken before and after leveling and alignment:
1. Standardized upper and lower study casts.
2. Standardized periapical radiograph.
3. Standardized extra-oral and intra-oral photographs.
4. Standardized cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Observations:
Sagittal cuts of upper and lower incisors in the center of the long axis will be selected. The labial alveolar bone thickness (LABT) of each incisor will be determined at the site neighboring to the widest point of the labiopalatal root in two levels separated by 3 mm (L1 and L2, respectively); these levels will be set along the long axis of the incisor and located every 3 mm from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) level. Labial alveolar bone thickness will be assessed at the cervical level (L1) and midroot level (L2) at T0 and T1. Furthermore, the apical root resorption (ARR) will be calculated by determining the difference in the total tooth length, which will be measured in millimeters from the incisal border to the root apex, between T0 and T1 (T1-T0).
Ethical consideration:
All patients will receive information about the future clinical trial study and give their consent by signing an informed consent.
Data management and analysis: All statistical analysis will be performed with SPSS software. Differences will be considered significant at P values less than 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I
will be treated using passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner (3M Unitek - USA).
Intervention: Device: passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner (3M Unitek - USA).
Clarity SL MBT brackets; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA
(passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner)
Group II
will be treated using conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature (3M Unitek - USA).
Intervention: Device: conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature (3M Unitek - USA).
Gemini MBT brackets; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA
(conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clarity SL MBT brackets; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA
(passive self-ligating ceramic orthodontic brackets with stainless steel archwire slot liner)
Gemini MBT brackets; 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA
(conventional stainless steel orthodontic brackets ligated with elastomeric ligature)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Complete permanent dentition (excluding third molars).
3. Angle Class I malocclusion.
4. Crowding anteriorly ranging from 2 to 4 mm.
5. Healthy young patients.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Blocked-out or High-up canines.
3. Patients who went to previous orthodontic treatment.
4. Evidence of periodontal or gingival problems.
5. Endodontic treatment.
14 Years
20 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Al Mansurah, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
9046380
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.