Analysis of Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using 3D Imaging
NCT ID: NCT03398798
Last Updated: 2020-05-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-01-15
2018-11-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants: Up to 80 patients at UNC School of Dentistry or Selden Orthodontics between the ages of 10 and 45, inclusive, who have been previously diagnosed with malocclusion requiring orthodontic treatment (braces) and are otherwise healthy.
Procedures (methods): Subjects receiving standard of care (SOC) orthodontic treatment will be randomized to one of two commonly used orthodontic archwires (.014" or .016" diameter). Subjects will be further subdivided for analysis based on the type of bracket (twin or self-ligating) that their clinician uses in their treatment. We will review the 3D digital images of each subject's dentition recorded as part of SOC at the 0-, 6- and 12-week visits. We will retrieve the archwires when they are removed per SOC by the clinician at the 12-week time point.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Use of 2D and 3D Imaging Modalities and Its Influence on Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Orthodontics
NCT01246830
Treatment of Crowding Without Extraction Using Self Ligating Brackets
NCT02996292
Characterizing Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Photographic Scans
NCT05780788
Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescents With Crowding and Displaced Teeth
NCT05664282
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Single Aligner Appliance for Treatment of Mild Crowding Cases in Adults.
NCT04988373
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study is to study the effect of wire dimension, timing and ligation method on leveling and aligning in orthodontic treatment using 3D imaging.
The study's specific aims are as follows:
1. To analyze the effect of wire dimension (.014" vs. .016") and time-course (first six weeks or second six weeks) on Stage I treatment
2. To correlate clinical tooth movements with bench data for four types of malalignment
1. In-out
2. Rotation
3. Tip
4. Vertical step
3. To analyze the effect of ligation method (twin vs. self-ligating) on Stage I treatment
These specific aims will serve to address the following hypothesis: Archwire dimension affects tooth movement in Stage I of orthodontic treatment, depending upon variation time-course (due to force decay of superelastic wires) and method of ligation (bracket type). This will be tested in a total of 80 patients who are undergoing active treatment in the University of North Carolina (UNC) orthodontic graduate clinic or at Selden Orthodontics. There will be four different groups in this study. In the twin bracket cohort, half the patients will be treated with .014" dimension wire and half will be treated with .016" dimension wire. In the self-ligating bracket cohort, half the patients will be treated with .014" dimension wire, and half will be treated with .016" dimension wire.
If the hypotheses are shown to be correct, then the subset of society receiving orthodontic treatment will be able to benefit from selection of bracket types and archwire dimensions that match their individual types and degrees of malalignment. This will allow for more efficient tooth movement with less unwanted movement, and could lead to shorter treatment times and less discomfort.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
In the twin bracket cohort, 40 dental arches are planned to be treated with .014" dimension wire, and 40 dental arches are planned to be treated with .016" dimension wire.
In the self-ligating bracket cohort, 40 dental arches are planned to be treated with .014" dimension wire, and 40 dental arches are planned to be treated with .016" dimension wire.
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Because there is a clear visual difference between twin and self-ligating brackets, there will be no blinding with regard to ligation method (bracket type).
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
.014" with twin brackets
.014" dimension CuNiTi orthodontic arch wires and .022" slot Ormco Insignia Metal Twin brackets.
.014"
.014" CuNiTi orthodontic arch wire
Twin brackets
Ormco Insignia Metal Twin brackets
.016" with twin brackets
.016" dimension CuNiTi orthodontic arch wires and .022" slot Ormco Insignia Metal Twin brackets.
.016"
.016" CuNiTi orthodontic arch wire
Twin brackets
Ormco Insignia Metal Twin brackets
.014" with self-ligating brackets
.014" dimension CuNiTi orthodontic arch wires and .022" slot Ormco Insignia SL (self-ligating) brackets.
.014"
.014" CuNiTi orthodontic arch wire
Self-ligating brackets
Ormco Insignia SL brackets
.016" with self-ligating brackets
.016" dimension CuNiTi orthodontic arch wires and .022" slot Ormco Insignia SL (self-ligating) brackets.
.016"
.016" CuNiTi orthodontic arch wire
Self-ligating brackets
Ormco Insignia SL brackets
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
.014"
.014" CuNiTi orthodontic arch wire
.016"
.016" CuNiTi orthodontic arch wire
Twin brackets
Ormco Insignia Metal Twin brackets
Self-ligating brackets
Ormco Insignia SL brackets
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Non-extraction treatment
* Maxillary and mandibular Little Index between 1-15 mm (this is a measurement of crowding)
* Presence of all permanent anterior teeth
* Age 10-45 years
* Consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Any spacing between anterior teeth
* Subjects who have incisor mandibular plane angle (IMPA) greater than or equal to 100 degrees
* Anterior tooth completely blocked from the arch form
* Periodontal pocketing of any teeth greater than 4 mm
* Maxillary and mandibular Little Index \>15 mm (This is a measurement of crowding. A Little Index of \>15 mm indicates a need for a smaller dimension arch wire)
10 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ching-Chang Ko, DDS, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UNC-CH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UNC-CH School of Dentistry
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Selden Orthodontics
Huntersville, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-1446
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.