Three-Dimensional Evaluation of the Airway Space After Distalization in Adults Using Carrière Motion Appliance

NCT ID: NCT05261217

Last Updated: 2022-03-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-18

Study Completion Date

2021-03-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Class II malocclusion is quite possibly most continuous treatment issues confronting orthodontists, addressing just about 33% malocclusions. connection between II malocclusion decreased pharyngeal aviation route measurements has been accounted for in writing. few treatment alternatives have been endeavored address this malocclusion, one those choices is distalize maxillary back without extraction treatment. In 2004 another machine presented Luis Carrière conveying his name, called Carrière Motion apparatus. Nonetheless, so far RCT in orthodontic writing assessed impact this machine elements aviation route.

The point this examination assess impact this machine upper aviation route CBCT pictures in treatment post-pubertal patiets dental II malocclusion. near report led comprising 18 members age range from 18-30 years age. treatment impacts assessed radiographically utilizing pre post-distalization CBCT pictures after I connection has been reached. three dimentional investigation performed contemplate impacts distalization upper aviation route. gathered information then genuinely broke down for treatment changes among pre post-distalization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients selected from outpatient center at Department Orthodontics, Faculty Oral Dental Medicine, Suez Canal University. Research Ethical Committee Faculty Oral Dental Medicine, Suez Canal University endorsed this investigation. Patients educated about methodology shown logical, enlivened recordings.

3\. Incorporation standards:

The chose patients had met accompanying models:

a) Adults full lasting dentition matured from (18-30). b) Dental II malocclusion beginning from half unit three quarter unit II relationship reciprocally where treatment plan did exclude extraction in upper curve.

c) A ordinary skeletal maxilla typical or gentle direct retrognathic mandible. d) Normal or flat development design. e) All patients ought have great oral cleanliness ought consent inspiration directions give sensible forecast.

f) Absence ejected maxillary third molars. g) The patients should be liberated from any foundational illness or medical conditions.

4\. Prohibition models:

1. Patients set experiences any genuine injury or medical procedure orofacial district.
2. sex inclination.
3. No history orthodontic treatment subjects.
4. No history obstructive breathing issues. 5-Methodology: 5.1 Preoperative intercession:

A Medical History Questionnaire:

A clinical filled patients bar any patients who might be experience ill effects any fundamental illness. Besides, patients checked ear nose throat expert affirm shortfall any aviation route problem.

5.2 Dental Case History Clinical Examination: A total dental case history acquired from every quiet patients analyzed clinically submitted both extraoral intraoral assessment. patients checked meet incorporation measures recently referenced. chose patients who met rules, alluded Periodontal Department centers for additional improvement oral cleanliness Restorative Department Clinics for any necessary fillings lastly alluded Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Department for extraction third maxillary molars in case they completely ejected in oral cavity.

5.3 Patients' Records: The accompanying records acquired from every understanding before endless supply treatment time, 5.3.1 Photographs For every tolerant bunch 4 extraoral 5 intraoral photos taken 5.3.2 Orthodontic Study Models All patients submitted upper lower impressions utilizing alginate impressionA material. wax wafer chomp additionally acquired. Impressions poured promptly utilizing extra hard stone model bases appropriately framed managed orthodontic norms 5.3.3 Cone Beam Computed Tomography: The chose patients submitted two CBCT examines; one pre-usable another after finish distalization utilizing Carrière Motion machine. CBCT pictures procured utilizing SOREDEX SCANORA 3D present in radiology office in Faculty Dentistry Suez Canal University. CBCT examining is performed producer's convention similar administrator. boundaries CBCT set suggestion assembling

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Orthodontic Appliance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The motion 3D II appliance

using The motion 3D II appliance on treating Class II orthodontic

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

The motion 3D II appliance

Intervention Type DEVICE

The motion 3D II appliance treating class II malocclusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The motion 3D II appliance

The motion 3D II appliance treating class II malocclusion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Dental II malocclusion beginning from half unit three quarter unit II relationship reciprocally where treatment plan did exclude extraction in upper curve.

A ordinary skeletal maxilla typical or gentle direct retrognathic mandible. Normal or flat development design. All patients ought have great oral cleanliness ought consent inspiration directions give sensible forecast.

Absence ejected maxillary third molars. The patients should be liberated from any foundational illness or medical conditions.

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Suez Canal University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Heba Allah Ahmed Ahmed ELghawy

Heba Allah Ahmed Ahmed Elgahawy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Heba Allah ELghawy, Bachlor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Suez Canal University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of dentistry, Suez canal university

Ismailia, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

192/2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mandibular First Molar Distalization
NCT04229797 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA