Carriere Motion Appliance* Versus In-office Sectional Appliance

NCT ID: NCT05204654

Last Updated: 2025-03-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

4 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-19

Study Completion Date

2023-02-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The "sagittal first" approach to Class II correction in orthodontic treatment involves correcting the antero-posterior (AP) relationship of the maxillary and mandibular dentition prior to the leveling and aligning phase of orthodontic treatment. The Carriere Motion Appliance (CMA) was made to provide sagittal correction prior to orthodontic treatment with minimal secondary tooth movements that are typically seen with Class II correction. The aim in this study is to explore the efficacy and efficiency of Class II molar correction in adolescent patients using the sagittal first approach with either a sectional, in-office fabricated appliance or the CMA, by measuring total treatment duration (in months) as well as comparing dental and skeletal measurements taken from lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained prior to Class II correction (T0) and immediately after removal of the appliance (T1). The investigators will also be comparing secondary molar and canine rotational movements after Class II correction by comparing digital dental casts obtained at T0 and T1.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators will be recruiting 12 to 17-year 11-month old patients with a Class II molar relationship,who are presenting for comprehensive orthodontic treatment at the Postgraduate orthodontic clinic at University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine. Recruited subjects will be randomized into one of 2 groups. Both groups will be receiving a method of Class II correction using the Sagittal First approach, which means the Class II molar relationship will be corrected prior to the leveling and aligning phase of orthodontic treatment. Subjects will be treated using either the Carriere Motion Appliance (CMA), or a sectional appliance fabricated with materials that are commonly found in orthodontic practice. Both appliances will be used according to the CMA guidelines. After Class II correction and removal of appliance, and prior to the next stage of treatment, an additional digital scan of the mouth and a lateral cephalometric radiograph will be taken. Dental and skeletal measurements from initial cephalometric radiographs and models will be subtracted from the corresponding measurements taken on radiographs and models obtained after Class II correction, and comparisons will be made between the two treatment treatment groups. Efficiency will be determined by number of months until Class II molar and canine correction was obtained, and efficacy will be determined by the skeletal and dental measurements obtained.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Angle Class 2 Malocclusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Subjects participating in the study and will then be randomly assigned to one of two treatment interventions:

1. Sagittal first approach using the CMA
2. Sagittal first approach using an in-office fabricated custom appliance

At the bonding appointment, the appliance will be bonded and AP correction will begin. Both treatment groups will have a button bonded to the mandibular first molars, and Essix retainers with 2 mm thickness will require to be worn at all times for mandibular anchorage during AP correction (only taken out to brush and eat). Both treatment groups will follow the CMA protocol for Class II correction, which consists of wearing Force 1 (1/4, 6 oz) Class II elastics for the first month of treatment, and Force 2 (3/16, 8 oz) Class II elastics for the remainder of Class II correction. Once Class II correction is complete, the appliance will be removed and a lateral cephalometric radiograph and digital model will be obtained
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Lateral cephalometric radiographs and digital study models will be de-identified prior to landmarking and obtaining measurements. The appliances will not be present on the patient when these records are obtained and therefore, when taking measurements, the outcomes assessor will not know which intervention the subjects received.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

In-office fabricated appliance

A customized in-office fabricated appliance using the printed digital model of the subject will be used for AP correction. AP correction will be completed following CMA protocol (see model description)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

In-office fabricated appliance

Intervention Type OTHER

A 0.022 Slot MBT™ second molar mini tube that has been modified to have a 2 mm length will be placed on the maxillary first molar and a 0.018 slot MBT™ maxillary canine bracket will be placed on the maxillary canine, with a 0.016x0.022 stainless-steel wire spanning from the maxillary first molar to the maxillary canine. A bayonet bend will be placed mesial to the molar tube. A curve will be bent into the wire, so that the wire is able to passively rest on the buccal surface of the maxillary canine. A stainless-steel closed coil will span the molar to canine and lay flush to the mesial portion of the molar tube and the distal portion of the canine bracket. The wire will be cinched mesial to the maxillary canine tie-wing and also 2-3 mm distal to the maxillary first molar to ensure that the molar can rotate during treatment, if needed. A stainless-steel tie will be used to secure the wire into the canine bracket. AP correction will be completed following CMA protocol

Carriere Motion Appliance

The appropriate length appliance will be placed as directed in the CMA handbook on the maxillary first molar and canine. AP correction will be completed following CMA protocol (see model description)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Carriere Motion Appliance

Intervention Type DEVICE

A bar spanning from the maxillary first molar to canine with a ball and socket joint at the molar and a canine pad at the canine. A slight bend is present between the molar and canine bracket. The ball and socket is designed to allow the molar to rotate to -15 degrees along it's longitudinal axis. The appliance claims that it allows for Class II correction with minimal secondary tooth movements when used with mandibular anchorage.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

In-office fabricated appliance

A 0.022 Slot MBT™ second molar mini tube that has been modified to have a 2 mm length will be placed on the maxillary first molar and a 0.018 slot MBT™ maxillary canine bracket will be placed on the maxillary canine, with a 0.016x0.022 stainless-steel wire spanning from the maxillary first molar to the maxillary canine. A bayonet bend will be placed mesial to the molar tube. A curve will be bent into the wire, so that the wire is able to passively rest on the buccal surface of the maxillary canine. A stainless-steel closed coil will span the molar to canine and lay flush to the mesial portion of the molar tube and the distal portion of the canine bracket. The wire will be cinched mesial to the maxillary canine tie-wing and also 2-3 mm distal to the maxillary first molar to ensure that the molar can rotate during treatment, if needed. A stainless-steel tie will be used to secure the wire into the canine bracket. AP correction will be completed following CMA protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

Carriere Motion Appliance

A bar spanning from the maxillary first molar to canine with a ball and socket joint at the molar and a canine pad at the canine. A slight bend is present between the molar and canine bracket. The ball and socket is designed to allow the molar to rotate to -15 degrees along it's longitudinal axis. The appliance claims that it allows for Class II correction with minimal secondary tooth movements when used with mandibular anchorage.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CMA

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males and Females
* Presenting for comprehensive orthodontic treatment at the Postgraduate orthodontic clinic at the University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine
* Unilateral or bilateral ½-cusp to full-cusp Class II molar and canine relationship
* Growing Patients (\~12-17y 11m)
* Subjects who do not require extractions as part of treatment mechanics
* Mild to moderate crowding

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients in mixed dentition
* Any missing teeth up to and including permanent first molars
* Bilateral molar relationship of less than ½ cusp Class II prior to appliance cementation
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

State University of New York at Buffalo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alexandria Mary Newton

Orthodontic Resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Covell, DDS, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Orthodontics Department Chair, University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00005827

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.