Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
63 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-10-31
2009-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Different Treatment Modalities of Class II Malocclusion on Upper Third Molars.
NCT06098885
TMJ Adaptations by Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescent Males With Angle's Class II Division 2 Malocclusion: MRI Study
NCT03406559
Class II Malocclusion Correction Using the Mini-screw Supported Advanced Molar Distalization Appliance
NCT06726694
Mandibular Response After Maxillary Orthopedic Expansion in Class II Growing Subjects
NCT03159962
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance
NCT03354442
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of our prospective study is to clarify the specific cephalometric indicators of biological responsiveness that lead to a successful Class II Div.1 treatment in growing individuals. These indicators will hopefully assist in the differential diagnosis of a "true" and a "pseudo" Class II, that is a masked Class I, that we presume will be relatively easy to treat and stable a treatment result.
70 -100 subjects with a Class II/I malocclusion will be recruited and treated with the exact mode of treatment. As Class II we consider the one that is a t least half molar cusp Class II. Patients will already erupted lower first premolars will be included as we presume this is the approximate time of the maximum growth spurt which we want to exploit using the functional appliance. Crowding in both arches should not exceed 4 mm so as to exclude any denoalveolar changes due to alignment. Any tooth agenesis, besides the third molars, will exclude the subject from the study. The medical history of the patient should be non-contributory regarding any hormonal abnormalities, arthritis and pain from the TMJ. Syndromic patients and those exhibiting craniofacial abnormalities will be excluded.
The skeletal age of each patient will be assessed by observing the cervical column.
Every patient will have his records taken, the latter including a lateral ceph and a panoramic x-ray. Standard intra- and extra oral pictures will be taken as well (T0).
The treatment protocol includes a first phase of 3-4 months of slow palatal expansions utilizing a removable palatal plate with a 0.25 mm jackscrew in the middle (T1). The screw will be turned once a week for two weeks and then twice a week until the upper posterior teeth are over-expanded 2 mm per side. During phase II (T2)the patient will be asked to wear the same appliance adjusted as such to incorporate a tongue crib that will force the mandible into a Class I relationship acthing the way the know functional appliances work (eg activator). The crib will incorporate 4 loops in the canine area and will be placed so as not to impinge in the lower lingual gingival region but it will be long enough so as the patient will not be able to shift the mandible back. If the initial overjet exceeds 5 mm the mandibular advancement will be gradual. Further adjustments will be made so as to maintain the Class I relationship. The patient will wear the appliance for 8-12 months (T3). New records will be taken at that time. If braces are needed, the patient will continue with fixed appliances.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mandibular Advancement Via A Functional Appliance
Functional appliance
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Crowding no more than 4 mm per side
* Healthy subjects
Exclusion Criteria
* TMJ symptoms
* Craniofacial abnormalities
* Arthritis
8 Years
15 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
IOANNA GIDARAKOU
Dr Ioanna Gidarakou
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
EFFI BASDRA, PHD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Orthodontic Clinic of Auth
Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ORTHODONTICS 1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.