Prefabricated Versus 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances
NCT ID: NCT04810286
Last Updated: 2021-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-01
2023-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative 3D Assessment of Class III Malocclusion Treatments
NCT07179354
Effect of T4K Versus Twin Block in Developing Class II Division I Malocculsion
NCT04337086
Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II
NCT06631235
Evaluation of 3D Printed Modified Twin Block for Correction of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion in Growing Females
NCT04028661
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance
NCT03354442
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental Group
3D-print myofunctional appliance
3d-Printing Myofunctional Appliance
To evaluate soft- and hard-tissue changes Class II division 1 tchildren with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printed myofunctional appliance.
Control Group
Prefabricated myfunctional appliance
3d-Printing Myofunctional Appliance
To evaluate soft- and hard-tissue changes Class II division 1 tchildren with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printed myofunctional appliance.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
3d-Printing Myofunctional Appliance
To evaluate soft- and hard-tissue changes Class II division 1 tchildren with a prefabricated myofunctional appliance versus a 3D-printed myofunctional appliance.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Skeletal Class II relationship (ANB \> 4 degree)
* No previous orthodontic treatment
Exclusion Criteria
8 Years
12 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ordu University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk
Associate Professor Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Ordu University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ordu University
Ordu, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-47
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.