The LARC Robot Simplifies Renal Access In Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

NCT ID: NCT07211555

Last Updated: 2025-10-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-01

Study Completion Date

2026-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is being done to evaluate a new robotic system that helps urologists more precisely reach the kidney during surgery to remove large kidney stones. The procedure, called percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), is typically used for people who have large or difficult-to-remove kidney stones.

Traditionally, many urologists rely on radiologists to place a tube into the kidney before surgery. This can cause delays, require multiple procedures, and increase costs. The robotic system being studied - called LARC - is designed to help the urologist safely and accurately guide a needle directly into the kidney during the surgery, without needing a separate procedure beforehand.

The robot uses live X-ray images to help align the instruments. Although parts of the robot have been approved by the U.S. FDA, the version used in this study is still investigational and not yet approved for this specific purpose.

The study will take place at AdventHealth Celebration and include up to 45 adult patients who are scheduled for PCNL surgery. Participants will be followed for up to 1 month after surgery, and doctors will look at outcomes such as the success of the procedure, the number of kidney stones removed, complications, time in surgery, and radiation exposure.

This research may help make kidney stone surgery safer, faster, and more effective in the future.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Stone Disease Kidney Calculi Refractory Kidney Stones Kidney Stones

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Assisted PCNL Using LARC System

This arm includes participants who will undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with renal access guided by the investigational LARC robotic system (Version 3.0). The procedure uses fluoroscopy-based navigation to assist the urologist in targeting the renal collecting system.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LARC Robotic System (Micromate™ Version 3.0)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The LARC Robotic System (Version 3.0) is an investigational configuration of the Micromate™ robotic platform by iSYS Medizintechnik GmbH (Austria). It uses fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation to assist urologists in obtaining precise renal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This version is not FDA-cleared and is being evaluated for feasibility, safety, and potential clinical benefit.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LARC Robotic System (Micromate™ Version 3.0)

The LARC Robotic System (Version 3.0) is an investigational configuration of the Micromate™ robotic platform by iSYS Medizintechnik GmbH (Austria). It uses fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation to assist urologists in obtaining precise renal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This version is not FDA-cleared and is being evaluated for feasibility, safety, and potential clinical benefit.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Kidney stones larger than 2 cm
* Staghorn renal calculi
* Lower pole stones less than 2 cm
* Anatomical abnormalities that reduce the likelihood of spontaneous stone fragment passage, such as:
* Horseshoe kidney
* Calyceal diverticulum
* Ectopic or dystopic kidney
* Stones that are refractory to prior treatment (e.g., ESWL or ureteroscopy)
* Suspected malignant tumors or masses located in the planned renal access tract

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Active urinary tract infection (UTI) or untreated sepsis
* Known bleeding disorders or uncorrectable coagulopathy despite medical management
* Use of anticoagulant medications (e.g., warfarin, heparin, or DOACs) that cannot be safely discontinued
* Allergy to contrast media that cannot be pre-medicated or managed
* Severe cardiopulmonary comorbidities that contraindicate anesthesia or PCNL
* Inability to provide informed consent
* Participation in another investigational study that may interfere with study outcomes
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AdventHealth

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Advent Health Medical Group Urology at Celebration

Celebration, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Petronio Senior Clinical Research Operations Manager, MHA

Role: CONTACT

407-303-3603

Bridget Clinical Research Operations Manager, MS, MPH

Role: CONTACT

407-303-3603

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Petronio Martins, MHA

Role: primary

407-303-3603

Bridget Miller, MS, MPH

Role: backup

407-303-3603

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Taylor E, Miller J, Chi T, Stoller ML. Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Transl Androl Urol. 2012 Dec;1(4):223-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2012.12.01. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26816715 (View on PubMed)

de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, Gutierrez J, Lingeman J, Scarpa R, Tefekli A; CROES PCNL Study Group. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011 Jan;25(1):11-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0424.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21247286 (View on PubMed)

Korets R, Speed JM, Wang Y, Chang SL. PD21-03 Percutaneous Access Obtained By Urologist Is Associated With Decreased Complications, Shorter Length Of Stay, And Lower Hospital Costs In PCNL. J Urol. 2017;197(4S):e436-e437. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.1041

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Ghoulian J, Nourian A, Dalimov Z, Ghiraldi EM, Friedlander JI. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Access: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Access by Urologist vs Radiologist. J Endourol. 2023 Jan;37(1):8-14. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0308. Epub 2022 Nov 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36136905 (View on PubMed)

Armitage JN, Withington J, Fowler S, Finch WJG, Burgess NA, Irving SO, Glass J, Wiseman OJ; BAUS section of Endourology. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy access by urologist or interventional radiologist: practice and outcomes in the UK. BJU Int. 2017 Jun;119(6):913-918. doi: 10.1111/bju.13817. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28220589 (View on PubMed)

Speed JM, Wang Y, Leow JJ, Bhojani N, Trinh QD, Chang SL, Korets R. The Effect of Physician Specialty Obtaining Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Perioperative Costs and Outcomes. J Endourol. 2017 Nov;31(11):1152-1156. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0441. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28859496 (View on PubMed)

Quirke K, Aydin A, Brunckhorst O, Bultitude M, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Sarica K, Ahmed K. Learning Curves in Urolithiasis Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Endourol. 2018 Nov;32(11):1008-1020. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0425.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30039711 (View on PubMed)

Metzler IS, Holt S, Harper JD. Surgical Trends in Nephrolithiasis: Increasing De Novo Renal Access by Urologists for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):769-774. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0888. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33430693 (View on PubMed)

Escobar Monroy R, Proietti S, De Leonardis F, Gisone S, Scalia R, Mongelli L, Gaboardi F, Giusti G. Complications in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Complications. 2025; 2(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3390/complications2010005

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Nguyen MV, Berger JH, Flores AR, Chen TT, Yared J, Pais V, Chew B, Humphreys MR, Stern KL, Sur RL. Case series - Liver injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Sep;17(9):E297-E301. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8291. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37458736 (View on PubMed)

Saluk J, Ebel J, Rose J, Posid T, Sourial M, Knudsen B. Fellowship training in endourology: Impact on percutaneous nephrolithotomy access patterns. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 Feb;16(2):E76-E81. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7339.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34582338 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2196760

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

HoYAG vs TFL in miniPCNL With ClearPetra
NCT07087977 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA