Intraoperative Cone-beam CT for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT ID: NCT04556396
Last Updated: 2024-06-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
234 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-25
2022-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PCNL Without Reverse Catheterization in the Split-leg Prone Position.
NCT06750913
The Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Not Indwelling of Ureteral Stents in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT06455618
A Pilot Study Assessing The Feasibility Of Outpatient Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
NCT01437904
FANS-Assisted Mini-PCNL for Complex Renal Stones
NCT07332286
Feasibility of Radiation-Free Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones
NCT06922006
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cone-beam CT (CBCT) is a novel portable imaging technique that can allow cross-sectional imaging to be obtained intraoperatively, rather than post-operatively. Incorporating this modality would allow the surgeon to determine whether the procedure should be continued, in the event of residual fragments, or if it can be safely concluded. This would obviate the need for dedicated postoperative CT scans and, more importantly, reduce the need for subsequent procedures and consequently decrease the patient's length of stay.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention arm
This arm will receive cone beam CT to perform an abdomen-pelvis CT scan immediately following initial percutaneous nephrolithotomy, before the patient emerges from general anesthesia, to allow the surgeon to determine whether additional work is needed or whether the procedure can be concluded without requiring further imaging or future interventions.
Cone beam CT
On-table CT scan in the operating room to determine residual kidney stone burden at end of procedure
Retrospective arm
This arm will contain a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent surgery prior to the enrollment of the intervention arm. These patients received the standard of care, namely helical CT postoperative day one.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cone beam CT
On-table CT scan in the operating room to determine residual kidney stone burden at end of procedure
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Scheduled for percutaneous nephrolithotomy with stone fragmentation (laser/ultrasonic/mechanical)
3. For the prospective intervention arm, willingness to consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients whose stones only reside within the mid or distal ureter(s) and thus would not be easily imaged with cone beam CT
3. Patients who have had lithotripsy on their renal unit within the prior 90 days
4. Pregnant patients
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Loyola University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kristin Baldea
MD, Assistant Professor Of Urology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kristin G Baldea, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Attending Physician
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pearle MS, Watamull LM, Mullican MA. Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol. 1999 Jul;162(1):23-6. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00006.
Nevo A, Holland R, Schreter E, Gilad R, Baniel J, Cohen A, Lifshitz DA. How Reliable Is the Intraoperative Assessment of Residual Fragments During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Prospective Study. J Endourol. 2018 Jun;32(6):471-475. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0005. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
Roy OP, Angle JF, Jenkins AD, Schenkman NS. Cone beam computed tomography for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: initial evaluation of a new technology. J Endourol. 2012 Jul;26(7):814-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0478. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
Pitteloud N, Gamulin A, Barea C, Damet J, Racloz G, Sans-Merce M. Radiation exposure using the O-arm(R) surgical imaging system. Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):651-657. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4773-0. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
Patel PM, Kandabarow AM, Chuang E, McKenzie K, Druck A, Seffren C, Blanco-Martinez E, Capoccia E, Farooq AV, Branch J, Turk TMT, Baldea KG. Using Intraoperative Portable CT Scan to Minimize Reintervention Rates in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Trial. J Endourol. 2022 Oct;36(10):1382-1387. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0049. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
212740
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.