Renogram Study With Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PERC): Alterations in Renal Blood Flow as a Consequence of PERC
NCT ID: NCT00169741
Last Updated: 2016-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
4 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-05-31
2016-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ureteral Stent Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy in Acutely Obstructed Infected Kidney
NCT03498794
Occlusion Balloon vs. 5FR Ureteral Catheter
NCT06798753
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Registry and Database
NCT00159393
Effectiveness of Drainage by PCN vs. JJ in Patients With Symptoms of Obstructive Kidney Disease Caused by Urolithiasis
NCT04594161
Intraoperative Cone-beam CT for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04556396
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The effect of PERC on renal function has been examined in an animal model by several groups. In one porcine model, the baseline renal function, as defined by PAH and creatinine clearance, was compared to that measured at one month post-procedure. No acute data were recorded, but the authors did note that although there was no significant change in renal function at the one month follow-up point, there was a significant amount of renal scarring present. This finding of significant renal scarring following PERC in an animal model has been corroborated by others. One group has studied a canine model, and detected a significant diminution of renal function (defined by creatinine clearance) at 48 hours following PERC, and at 6 weeks following PERC renal function returned to normal. In human subjects undergoing PERC, percutaneous tracts have also been associated with renal scarring. These studies, both retrospective case series, did not capture strictly defined measures of renal function, such as creatinine clearance, but rather compared pre- and post-procedure serum creatinine as a surrogate for renal function. No significant change in serum creatinine was identified in either study, but blood collections were performed at variable times, in uncontrolled settings.
Nuclear renography is an imaging technique that records renal functional parameters. There has been only one report of nuclear renographic assessment of the effect of PERC on renal function. This report was an uncontrolled study, and the renograms were performed at a median of 22 days post-procedure. At this time interval, it is not possible to derive any conclusions regarding the acute effects of PERC on renal function.
The investigators have recently demonstrated in a porcine model that PERC is associated acutely with significant deleterious effects on renal function. Following routine PERC, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF) decline by 50% in both the treated and the untreated kidney and return to normal when measured at 72 \& 74 hours (n=3 pigs). Sodium excretion, however, was markedly below baseline at 72 and 74 hours in 2 of the 3 pigs. PAH extraction, a measure of the efficiency of renal tubular secretion of organic anions, averaged 43.5 ± 9.7% and 42.6 ± 14.1% at 72 and 74 hours for the 3 pigs. These values are substantially below the baseline value of 80.4 ± 4.0% measured in sham-PNL pigs.
To date, the examination of the effect of PERC on renal function has been restricted to gross measures of function as defined by serum creatinine, and radionuclide studies performed at a sub-acute interval following PNL, often without differential measurements or controls. Importantly, the investigators' recent studies in a porcine model demonstrate that PERC may cause significant alterations in renal function. There is a need to define in a rigorous fashion the effect PERC has on renal blood flow and renal function. If a deleterious effect is identified, future efforts can be focused on minimizing this insult.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
cohort
Renogram
Subjects who enroll in this study will undergo a nuclear scan called a renogram to assess renal function prior to surgery (baseline), approximately one hour after surgery (to assess percutaneous effects on renal function) and finally approximately 6 weeks post-operatively (to assess return to baseline).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Renogram
Subjects who enroll in this study will undergo a nuclear scan called a renogram to assess renal function prior to surgery (baseline), approximately one hour after surgery (to assess percutaneous effects on renal function) and finally approximately 6 weeks post-operatively (to assess return to baseline).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age greater than 18 years
* Ability to provide informed consent
* Unilateral renal calculi appropriate for percutaneous removal
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to give informed consent
* Pregnant
* Renal calculi associated with infection
* Serum creatinine \> 1.4 mg/dL
* Renal obstruction
* Renal anatomic abnormality precluding accurate functional assessment using nuclear medicine techniques
* Renal duplication/anatomic abnormality (e.g., horseshoe kidney, malrotation, ectopia, etc.)
* Pre-existing diuretic therapy
* Solitary functional kidney or suspected significant differential in renal function
* Presence of diabetes, hypertension, or any other systemic disorder or medication known to affect renal function
* History of urinary tract infection
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indiana Kidney Stone Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
James E Lingeman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IU Health Physicians Urology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IU Health Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
05-043
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.