Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones

NCT ID: NCT02037906

Last Updated: 2016-03-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Research Problem: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) dramatically changed the management of renal and ureteral calculus disease. In vitro studies suggest that progressive increase in lithotripter energy output voltage could produce the best overall stone comminution in comparison with constant or deescalating energy output. However, it is possible that the beneficial impact of slow rate SWL on comminution of stones and stone free rates has masked any marginal benefits for energy output escalation. The Escalating SW method adds the benefit of less renal tissue injury.

Research Significance:The present study will signifies and evaluates the stone free rates of three groups of patients with renal stones treated with different SWL energy outputs (Escalating, Constant and Reduction energy output).

Research Objectives: The aim of this research project is to study the effect of dose adjustment strategies on success rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the clinical setting and to optimize the conditions for successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Research Methodology: This clinical trial will be conducted at a tertiary care university hospital. 150 patients referred to the Shock wave lithotripsy unit will be evaluated for eligibility to be randomized into three groups (Dose Escalation, Dose reduction and constant dose). Parameter of the three groups will be compared to detect the treatment difference.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Escalating SW amplitude treatment protocols have been shown to be safe on long-term with less harm to kidney tissue. This clinical trial will be conducted at a tertiary care university hospital. All patients referred to the SWL unit will be evaluated for eligibility to be randomized. Randomization process "complete" or "unrestricted" randomization was used to allocate patients to the three arms of the clinical trial where one patient was randomly assigned to one of the three arms blindly.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Stones

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Escalating Energy SWL

50 Patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Escalating Energy SWL

Intervention Type RADIATION

Dose escalation, 1500 SW at 18 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following 1500 SW at 22 kv.

Constant Energy SWL

50 Patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Constant Energy SWL

Intervention Type RADIATION

Constant dose at 20 kv

Reduction Energy SWL

50 Patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reduction Energy SWL

Intervention Type RADIATION

Dose reduction, 1500 SW at 22 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following at 18 kv.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Escalating Energy SWL

Dose escalation, 1500 SW at 18 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following 1500 SW at 22 kv.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Constant Energy SWL

Constant dose at 20 kv

Intervention Type RADIATION

Reduction Energy SWL

Dose reduction, 1500 SW at 22 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following at 18 kv.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Single stone
* Radio opaque
* Less than 2cm in size
* Renal stone

Exclusion Criteria

* bleeding disorder,
* urinary tract infection (UTI)
* distal ureteric obstruction
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Princess Al-Johara Al-Ibrahim Cancer Research Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Danny M Rabah, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

College Of Medicine, King Saud University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

King Khalid University Hospital

Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Saudi Arabia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13/3948/IRB

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

13/3948/IRB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Energy Ramping Versus Fixed Dose ESWL
NCT07334236 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA