Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones
NCT ID: NCT02037906
Last Updated: 2016-03-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2016-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Research Significance:The present study will signifies and evaluates the stone free rates of three groups of patients with renal stones treated with different SWL energy outputs (Escalating, Constant and Reduction energy output).
Research Objectives: The aim of this research project is to study the effect of dose adjustment strategies on success rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the clinical setting and to optimize the conditions for successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
Research Methodology: This clinical trial will be conducted at a tertiary care university hospital. 150 patients referred to the Shock wave lithotripsy unit will be evaluated for eligibility to be randomized into three groups (Dose Escalation, Dose reduction and constant dose). Parameter of the three groups will be compared to detect the treatment difference.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
(SWL) Versus (ODT) Versus Combined SWL And ODT For Radiolucent Stone
NCT03388060
Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Under Selective, General Anesthesia.
NCT01008267
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341
The Efficacy of Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and Combined ESWL and ODT as Non-Invasive Modalities for Treating Small and Medium-Sized Radiolucent Renal Stones
NCT06814834
Comparison Between Two Shock Wave Regimens for Treating Urinary Stones
NCT01222325
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Escalating Energy SWL
50 Patients
Escalating Energy SWL
Dose escalation, 1500 SW at 18 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following 1500 SW at 22 kv.
Constant Energy SWL
50 Patients
Constant Energy SWL
Constant dose at 20 kv
Reduction Energy SWL
50 Patients
Reduction Energy SWL
Dose reduction, 1500 SW at 22 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following at 18 kv.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Escalating Energy SWL
Dose escalation, 1500 SW at 18 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following 1500 SW at 22 kv.
Constant Energy SWL
Constant dose at 20 kv
Reduction Energy SWL
Dose reduction, 1500 SW at 22 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following at 18 kv.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Radio opaque
* Less than 2cm in size
* Renal stone
Exclusion Criteria
* urinary tract infection (UTI)
* distal ureteric obstruction
30 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Princess Al-Johara Al-Ibrahim Cancer Research Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Danny M Rabah, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
College Of Medicine, King Saud University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
King Khalid University Hospital
Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13/3948/IRB
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
13/3948/IRB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.