Energy Ramping Versus Fixed Dose ESWL

NCT ID: NCT07334236

Last Updated: 2026-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-03

Study Completion Date

2026-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial compares two techniques of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) - energy ramping versus fixed dose - in adult patients with renal stones. The study aims to evaluate stone-free rates, retreatment needs, and safety outcomes across multiple clinical sites in Egypt.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This multi-center, randomized controlled trial investigates the impact of energy ramping versus fixed-dose ESWL on stone clearance in patients with solitary renal calculi. Participants will be assigned to either a gradually increasing energy protocol or a constant energy protocol using standardized lithotripter settings. The primary outcome is stone-free rate at two weeks post-treatment, assessed via imaging. Secondary outcomes include retreatment rate, pain scores, adverse events, and procedure duration. The study is conducted under IRB approval from Sohag University and follows international ethical standards for human research.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Calculi

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized Parallel Assignment Randomized, two-arm parallel assignment comparing energy-ramping ESWL versus fixed-dose ESWL; participants randomized 1:1. Treatment allocation is stratified by stone size (\<10 mm vs ≥10 mm). Primary outcomes assessed at 3 months post-treatment.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

fixed-dose ESWL

* Start therapeutic/high energy (e.g., 80-100% device max) from therapeutic phase.
* Total shocks: 2000-3000 adjusted by fragmentation progress and tolerance. Log shocks and cumulative energy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fixed Voltage (experimental): Subjects receive shock wave therapy at a constant energy level (e.g., 20-22 kV) for the entire duration of the session. Standard delivery includes approximately 3,000 shocks at a frequency of 60-90 shocks per minute.

Voltage Ramping (control): Subjects receive shock wave therapy starting at a low energy level (e.g., 6-10 kV) for an initial "priming" phase of 100-500 shocks. Energy is then escalated in predefined increments (e.g., 1-2 kV every 250-500 shocks) until reaching the target therapeutic voltage.

escalating-dose ESWL

* Stepwise escalation: increase energy every 500-1000 shocks (example: 20% → 40% → 60% → 80-100%) until therapeutic energy reached.
* Total shocks: 2000-3000 adjusted by fragmentation progress and tolerance. Log shocks per step and cumulative energy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fixed Voltage (experimental): Subjects receive shock wave therapy at a constant energy level (e.g., 20-22 kV) for the entire duration of the session. Standard delivery includes approximately 3,000 shocks at a frequency of 60-90 shocks per minute.

Voltage Ramping (control): Subjects receive shock wave therapy starting at a low energy level (e.g., 6-10 kV) for an initial "priming" phase of 100-500 shocks. Energy is then escalated in predefined increments (e.g., 1-2 kV every 250-500 shocks) until reaching the target therapeutic voltage.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Fixed Voltage (experimental): Subjects receive shock wave therapy at a constant energy level (e.g., 20-22 kV) for the entire duration of the session. Standard delivery includes approximately 3,000 shocks at a frequency of 60-90 shocks per minute.

Voltage Ramping (control): Subjects receive shock wave therapy starting at a low energy level (e.g., 6-10 kV) for an initial "priming" phase of 100-500 shocks. Energy is then escalated in predefined increments (e.g., 1-2 kV every 250-500 shocks) until reaching the target therapeutic voltage.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults ≥18 years.
* Radiopaque renal or proximal/mid ureteral stone ≤20 mm.
* eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m².
* Fit for ESWL.
* Able to give informed consent and complete follow up.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Pregnancy.

* Active, untreated UTI.
* Uncorrected bleeding disorder or anticoagulation that cannot be stopped.
* Prior ipsilateral renal surgery.
* Non radio-opaque stone without reliable imaging.
* Inability to tolerate ESWL or required anesthesia.
Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

mohammed Abdelhafez

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

mohammed Abdelhafez

Urology Resident , sohag hospital university

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sohag university Hospital

Sohag, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

mohammed A Abdelhafez

Role: CONTACT

+201143548707

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

ahmed abdelhamed, professor

Role: primary

+201068056074

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Soh-med--25-11-18MS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 UNKNOWN PHASE4