Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
158 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-07-27
2024-01-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Will radiation exposure be reduced?
* Will the stone-free status be affected? The researchers will compare the fluoroscopic control intervals of 250 shocks and 500 shocks.
Participants will:
* Take to a maximum of 3 sessions.
* Check once a week
* Group 1 was fluoroscopically monitored every 250 shocks, and Group 2 was fluoroscopically monitored every 500 shocks
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Narrow Versus Wide Focal Zones for Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi
NCT01226875
The Efficacy of Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and Combined ESWL and ODT as Non-Invasive Modalities for Treating Small and Medium-Sized Radiolucent Renal Stones
NCT06814834
Urinary NGAL and KIM-1 After ESWL
NCT07341269
Effects of Flexible Ureteroscopy on Renal Blood Flow
NCT03023488
Comparison Between Two Shock Wave Regimens for Treating Urinary Stones
NCT01222325
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
250 shocks
In our clinic, it is standard practice to perform a fluoroscopic check after every 250 shocks during the SWL session. Group 1 was fluoroscopically monitored every 250 shocks.
Shock wave lithotripsy
SWL works on the principle of focusing on the calculus using fluoroscopy. There has yet to be a consensus on the optimal frequency of fluoroscopic monitoring in the literature.
500 shocks
Group 2 was fluoroscopically monitored every 500 shocks.
Shock wave lithotripsy
SWL works on the principle of focusing on the calculus using fluoroscopy. There has yet to be a consensus on the optimal frequency of fluoroscopic monitoring in the literature.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Shock wave lithotripsy
SWL works on the principle of focusing on the calculus using fluoroscopy. There has yet to be a consensus on the optimal frequency of fluoroscopic monitoring in the literature.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cengiz Canakcı, MD
Principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Health Science University Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Canakci0001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.