Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High Density Renal Stones

NCT ID: NCT04346134

Last Updated: 2022-02-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-14

Study Completion Date

2021-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Several studies were conducted to compare extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) as treatment options for medium size lower caliceal high dense stones. However, no studies compared these options for non- lower polar stones.

In the present study the investigators will compare mini-PNL and SWL in treatment of non- lower polar, medium size, high dense renal stones in reference to the stone free rate and safety of the procedures.

Pre-operative evaluation including abdominal non-contrasted computed tomography will be performed for all patients. Patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups and will be treated by either mini-PNL or SWL. postoperative, patients will be followed by regularly for 3 months. the outcome of the procedures will be evaluated and compared between groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The European guidelines put SWL and PNL as an equal treatment options for non- lower polar renal stones from 10 to 20 mm size regardless of density. However, several studies reported markedly reduced SFR after SWL with increased density. Also, in practice, the investigators noticed a high failure rate in renal stones with high density regardless of stone size. Several studies were conducted to compare SWL and PNL as treatment options for medium size lower caliceal stones. However, no studies compared these options for non- lower polar stones.

In the present study the investigators will compare mini-PNL and SWL in treatment of non- lower polar, medium size, high dense renal stones in reference to the SFR and safety of the procedures.

Adult patients with renal stones who agree to participate in the study will evaluated evaluated by full medical history taking and thorough physical examination, urinalysis, urine culture and antibiogram, complete blood cell count (CBC), serum creatinine, liver function tests and coagulation profile. Plain abdominal X-ray for kidney, ureters and urinary bladders (KUB), abdominal ultrasonography and abdominal non-contrasted computed tomography (NCCT). Preoperative assessment of renal anatomy and stone characteristics will be based on the findings of abdominal NCCT.

patients with high density (\>1000 HU), non-lower polar, single renal stone of 10 to 20 mm size will be randomly divided into 2 equal groups. mini-PNL group, in which PNL procedures will be performed using miniature nephroscope and SWL group, in which SWL procedures will be performed using Dornier Lithotripter. SWL will be performed for a maximum of 3 sessions.

Patients will be followed up regularly, post-operatively for 3 months. NCCT will be performed after 3 months for detection of stone free status. Baseline data, intra-operative and post-operative parameters will be compared between groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Stone Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Double-arm, prospective, Randomized, intervention study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

mini-PNL group

In which percutaneous nephrolithotomy will be performed using miniature nephroscope.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mini-PNL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy using miniature nephroscope. The procedure will be performed under general or spinal anesthesia under fluoroscopy guidance.

SWL group

In which extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy will be performed using Dornier lithotripter SII

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SWL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy using Dornier SII lithotripter. the procedure will be performed under sedoanalgesia, and fluoroscopy will be used for stone localization; for a maximum of 3 SWL session.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mini-PNL

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy using miniature nephroscope. The procedure will be performed under general or spinal anesthesia under fluoroscopy guidance.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

SWL

Extracorporal shockwave lithotripsy using Dornier SII lithotripter. the procedure will be performed under sedoanalgesia, and fluoroscopy will be used for stone localization; for a maximum of 3 SWL session.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients with high density (\>1000 HU), non-lower polar, single renal stone of 10 to 20 mm size

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women, morbid obesity, severe orthopaedic deformities, any co-morbidities precluding general anaesthesia or prone positioning, uncorrectable coagulation disorders, active urinary tract infection (UTI), stone in calyceal diverticulum, abnormal renal anatomy and urinary tract obstruction distal to the stone
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Al-Azhar University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abul-fotouh Ahmed

Professor of Urology and Andrology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Urology Department, Al-Azhar University Hospital

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Uro_Azhar_16_019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 UNKNOWN PHASE4
Energy Ramping Versus Fixed Dose ESWL
NCT07334236 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones
NCT06465784 COMPLETED PHASE4