Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones

NCT ID: NCT04856722

Last Updated: 2024-12-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

255 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-05

Study Completion Date

2024-06-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The optimal management of medium-sized renal stones remains quite challenging and continues to be contested. In the present study, the investigators will compare mini-PNL, RIRS and SWL in the treatment of non- lower pole, medium size, high dense renal stones regarding the stone-free rate, the safety of the procedures, cost, and patients' and surgeon's satisfaction. Eligible patients will be randomly allocated into three equal groups (mini-PNL, RIRS, and SWL). Postoperative, patients will be followed-up by regularly for 3 months. The study parameters will be compared between groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The treatment options for renal stones 10-20 mm include either extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or endourology (retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL).

SWL is an attractive treatment option for renal stones because it is non-invasive and more acceptable for the patient and can be done under analgesia, sedation, or minimal anaesthesia. However, the limitation of SWL includes a relatively lower stone-free rate (SFR) and the need for repeated sessions and auxiliary procedures. The SFR after SWL is affected by several factors, including body mass index (BMI), stone size, intrarenal stone location, skin-to-stone distance (SSD), and stone density.

The EAU guidelines put endourology and SWL as two equal options in medium-sized non-lower pole renal stones and did not give special attention to the stone density, which is an important predictor for SWL outcome. Several studies reported that the number of SWL sessions increased with increased stone attenuation value (SAV) and SFR decreased significantly in high-density renal stone.

PNL and RIRS have good SFR compared to SWL but might entail a significant risk of morbidity. The improved fURS instrumentation and lithotripsy technology, and development of the miniaturized PNL technique, may lower the procedure-related complications and mPNL and RIRS an alternative and excellent option for medium-sized and even large renal stones The investigators hypothesize that addressing the stone density factor may give a clear recommendation for medium-sized, high-density renal stones. They expected the superiority for either mPNL or RIRS, regarding SFR, without increased morbidity.

The study aims to compare the outcome of mPNL, RIRS, and SWL for treatment of non-lower pole, high-density renal stones of 10 to 20 mm size.

The study will include adult patients with non-lower pole, high-density (\>1000 HU) renal stones of 10 to 20 mm size.

Pre-operatively, patients will be evaluated by medical history taking, physical examination. urinalysis, urine culture, complete blood cell count (CBC), liver function tests, coagulation profile, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, plain abdominal X-ray and computed tomography for urinary tract (CT-UT), Eligible patients will be randomly divided into 3 equal groups. PNL group, in which PNL procedures will be performed using miniature nephroscope, RIRS group, in which RIRS will be performed using flexible ureteroscope and SWL group, in which SWL procedures will be performed using Dornier Lithotripter.

post-operatively, patients will be followed up regularly, for 3 months. The SFR, complication rate, cost, patients' and surgeon's satisfaction will be evaluated and compared between the three groups using the appropriate statistical tests and analytical program.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Stone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

mini-PNL group

In which PCNL will be performed using miniature nephroscope

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mini-PNL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PCNL using miniature nephroscope. The procedure will be performed under general or regional anaesthesia under fluoroscopy guidance.

RIRS group

In which RIRS will be performed using a flexible ureteroscope

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RIRS

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

RIRS using flexible ureteroscope. The procedure will be performed under general or regional anaesthesia under fluoroscopy guidance. Holmium Laser lithotripter will be used for stone fragmentation.

SWL group

In which extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy will be performed using Dornier lithotripter SII

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SWL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

SWL using Dornier SII lithotripter. the procedure will be performed under sedoanalgesia, and fluoroscopy will be used for stone localization; for a maximum of 3 SWL session.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mini-PNL

PCNL using miniature nephroscope. The procedure will be performed under general or regional anaesthesia under fluoroscopy guidance.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

RIRS

RIRS using flexible ureteroscope. The procedure will be performed under general or regional anaesthesia under fluoroscopy guidance. Holmium Laser lithotripter will be used for stone fragmentation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

SWL

SWL using Dornier SII lithotripter. the procedure will be performed under sedoanalgesia, and fluoroscopy will be used for stone localization; for a maximum of 3 SWL session.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (both genders)
* Single non-lower pole renal stone.
* Stone size: 10-20 mm.
* Stone density: \> 1000 HU.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women.
* Morbid obesity.
* Severe orthopaedic deformities.
* Co-morbidities precluding general anaesthesia or prone positioning.
* Uncorrectable coagulation disorders.
* Active urinary tract infection (UTI).
* Stone in a calyceal diverticulum.
* Abnormal renal anatomy.
* Urinary tract obstruction distal to the stone.
* Concomitant pathology that needs intervention in the same setting.
* Advanced hydronephrosis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Al-Azhar University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abul-fotouh Ahmed

Professor of Urology and Andrology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Abul-fotouh Ahmed, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Al-Azhar University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Urology Department, Al-Azhar University Hospital

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Uro_Azhar_11_021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id