Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Kidney Stones Greater Than 2 cm
NCT ID: NCT03189264
Last Updated: 2017-06-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-05-10
2017-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
At present there are multiple scales measuring the lithiasic morphology (Guy, the STONE nephrolitometry score system and the nomogram of the Office of Clinical Investigation of the Endourology Society - CROES) which allow to evaluate the degree of complexity of the stone, the possibility of residual stones and the risk of complications. These tools allow us to do a better analysis of the risk factors of the patient who will be taken to this type of endoscopic procedure in order to decrease morbidity and complication rates.
Hypothesis:
The use of pneumatic dilators during percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduces the rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications, which would have an impact on hospitalization times and surgical success for the management of renal stone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PCNL Without Reverse Catheterization in the Split-leg Prone Position.
NCT06750913
Occlusion Balloon vs. 5FR Ureteral Catheter
NCT06798753
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT00873054
Standard-PCNL vs Mini-PCNL vs Super-mini PCNL for the Treatment of ≥2 cm Renal Stone
NCT03771365
The Influence of SMP on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo
NCT02760134
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The success and results of the treatment of surgery are very well known and highly dependent on precision in the puncture stage (the stones must be achieved with a precise and direct path), make this step is the most challenge for surgeons. The ideal access is one that allows complete removal of the stones while minimizing intraoperative bleeding. Needle punctures and their complications, such as kidney injuries and adjacent organs, eventually impair the overall surgical success and outcome of the patient. Although PCNL is considered minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with many associated benefits, such as the production of small incisions in the patient, reducing hospitalization time and postoperative recovery, some complications still occur frequently. The dilation of the nephrostomy tract is the second step in which there are more complications, since it depends on an optimal puncture of the collecting system and a precise manual control to avoid damages of the collecting system or to increase the risks of bleeding.
Restricted vision, difficulty in handling the Instrumental, restrictive mobility within the kidney, skill levels of hand-eye coordination of the surgeon, deviation of the needle, moving anatomical objective, are a constant challenge for the surgeon. Several technological advances have been proposed to improve the effectiveness of this procedure. In regard to puncture and dilatation, relevant contributions have been provided by the improvement in medical imaging techniques, as well as the fusion of multiple imaging procedures.
Main goal
To determine the highest rate of intraoperative and early postoperative complications (bleeding, pain) with the use of the various methods of access to the renal collecting system during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm than 2 cm between April 2017 and January 2018.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with Coaxial Dilatation
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with Coaxial Dilatation for treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm.
percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones
Use of various methods of access to the renal collecting system (pneumatic balloon dilatation vs. traditional technique with coaxial dilators) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with Pneumatic Balloon
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with Pneumatic Balloon for treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm.
percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones
Use of various methods of access to the renal collecting system (pneumatic balloon dilatation vs. traditional technique with coaxial dilators) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones
Use of various methods of access to the renal collecting system (pneumatic balloon dilatation vs. traditional technique with coaxial dilators) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of kidney stones greater than 2 cm.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Non-staghorn kidney stones greater than 2 cm
Exclusion Criteria
* Solitary Functioning Kidney
* Pyonephrosis
* Pregnancy
* Urinary tract infection
* Cardiopulmonary Restrictions Limiting Prone Position
* BMI greater than 35
* More of 2 puncture of the excretory tract
* STONE score equal or greater than 12
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dr Carlos Hernández
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr Carlos Hernández
Urologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carlos E Hernandez, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LOS COMUNEROS
Andres Gutierrez, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LOS COMUNEROS
Jose G Ramos, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LOS COMUNEROS
Diana M Chaparro, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LOS COMUNEROS
Eduardo Ardila, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LOS COMUNEROS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitario Los Comuneros
Bucaramanga, , Colombia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lopes T, Sangam K, Alken P, Barroilhet BS, Saussine C, Shi L, de la Rosette J; Clinical Research Office of The Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Study Group. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: tract dilation comparisons in 5537 patients. J Endourol. 2011 May;25(5):755-62. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0488. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
GOODWIN WE, CASEY WC, WOOLF W. Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc. 1955 Mar 12;157(11):891-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.1955.02950280015005. No abstract available.
Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10(3):257-9. doi: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084.
Beiko D, Elkoushy MA, Kokorovic A, Roberts G, Robb S, Andonian S. Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the rate of readmission? J Endourol. 2015 Apr;29(4):410-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0584. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
Tailly T, Razvi H. The S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring system: How valid is it? Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 May-Jun;9(5-6):196. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3020. No abstract available.
Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM. The Guy's stone score--grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology. 2011 Aug;78(2):277-81. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.026. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
Akhavein A, Henriksen C, Syed J, Bird VG. Prediction of single procedure success rate using S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry surgical classification system with strict criteria for surgical outcome. Urology. 2015 Jan;85(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.010.
Okhunov Z, Friedlander JI, George AK, Duty BD, Moreira DM, Srinivasan AK, Hillelsohn J, Smith AD, Okeke Z. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi. Urology. 2013 Jun;81(6):1154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.083. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
Shahrour W, Andonian S. Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: initial series. Urology. 2010 Dec;76(6):1288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.001.
Beiko D, Lee L. Outpatient tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the initial case series. Can Urol Assoc J. 2010 Aug;4(4):E86-90. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.886.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.