Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT ID: NCT00873054
Last Updated: 2014-02-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
32 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-10-31
2011-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Efficiency and Stone-Free Rates Mini PCNL vs Flex URS
NCT07072598
Comparing Previously Placed Nephrostomy Tract (NT) Versus Single Stage Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)
NCT00907946
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304
PCNL Without Reverse Catheterization in the Split-leg Prone Position.
NCT06750913
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1 ESWL
In this procedure,scope will be placed inside bladder and a plastic tube (stent) will be left to drain the kidney on the affected side in a routine manner. Next the patient will be transferred to a separate room and sound waves will be aimed at the center of the stone until the stone is broken into pieces.
No interventions assigned to this group
2 PCNL
In this procedure,scope will be placed inside bladder and a plastic tube (stent) will be left to drain the kidney on the affected side in a routine manner. Next, a small (1cm) cut will be made in the back and a tube will be placed into the kidney. Through this tube a small camera will be placed inside the kidney and break the stone into many pieces and remove them through the same tube. All fragments that can be seen will be removed. A different plastic tube (drain) will be placed through the cut and into the kidney and left in place for 5-7 days.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Stone burden between 10 and 20 mm diagnosed by CT scan
* Patient must be agreeable to randomization between shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous stone removal
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are pregnant based on routine pre-operative pregnancy testing
* Patients with skin to stone size greater than 12 cm (measured routinely on CT scan)
* Patients with either Horseshoe kidney, transplant kidney or a solitary kidney
* Patients with ureteral calculi
* Patients with stone size of \< 10 mm and \> 20 mm
* Ureteropelvic junction obstruction
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CAMC Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Samuel Deem, DO
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Julio G. Davalos, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CAMC Medical Staff - with admitting privileges
Frederick Martinez, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CAMC Medical Staff - with admitting privileges
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Urology Center of Charleston
Charleston, West Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Setthawong V, Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Pattanittum P. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
08-08-2078
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.