HoYAG vs TFL in miniPCNL With ClearPetra

NCT ID: NCT07087977

Last Updated: 2025-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-01

Study Completion Date

2026-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy is the treatment of choice for kidney stones over 2cm. This procedure commonly uses laser energy for breaking the stones, and among possible laser platforms, Hoyag and thulium fiber laser are FDA approved. Recently, this procedure has also included the use of vacuum assisted renal access sheaths, which allows suction to be employed together with the breaking of stones. This study intends to compare outcomes when using either laser platforms with suction sheaths in participants undergoing mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stones.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Due to the reduced diameter sheath of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (miniPCNL), surgical outcomes commonly rely on stone fragmentation provided by a laser energy source. Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser (HoYAG) has long been considered the gold-standard for lithotripsy, but this position has been challenged by the introduction of the thulium fiber laser (TFL) since its approval for clinical use in 2017. In the same manner, the recently developed ClearPetra™(MicroTech Endoscopy®, China) vacuum-assisted renal access sheath (VA-RAS) is a novel technology that allows for concomitant irrigation and suction during the procedure.

No prior studies to date have exclusively investigated mini-PCNL outcomes with Ho:YAG and TFL when using VA-RAS. This study addresses the literature paucity regarding the outcomes when utilizing the high-power Ho:YAG with MOSES technology vs. TFL in mini-PCNL with VA-RAS. This study hypothesizes that the Ho:YAG may provide more efficient stone clearance, secondary to its superior ability to fragment stones when compared to the TLF laser, which primarily dusts despite the laser settings utilized.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nephrolithiasis Kidney Stone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Parallel assignment
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MiniPCNL with HoYAG

In Arm 1, participants will undergo miniPCNL with ClearPetra™ vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath with HoYAG laser platform. Participants will undergo miniPCNL per standard of care

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

HoYAG laser

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG laser or TFL laser group for miniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.

MiniPCNL with TFL

In Arm 2, participants will undergo miniPCNL with ClearPetra™ vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath with TFL laser platform. Participants will undergo miniPCNL per standard of care

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TFL laser platform

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG or TFL laser group for MiniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HoYAG laser

Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG laser or TFL laser group for miniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.

Intervention Type DEVICE

TFL laser platform

Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG or TFL laser group for MiniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Males or females over 18 years of age
2. Patients with kidney stones, with stone burden larger than 15 mm.
3. Patients undergoing new percutaneous access with primary, supine, unilateral mini-PCNL.

Exclusion Criteria

4. Simultaneous use of more than 1 laser platform or other form of fragmentation (e.g., ultrasonic).
5. Patients undergoing simultaneous treatment of contralateral kidney stones during the same procedure.
6. Patients undergoing simultaneous treatment of ureteral stones during the same procedure.
7. Pregnant patients.
8. Presence of genitourinary anatomical abnormalities.
9. Uncorrected coagulopathy.
10. External urinary catheters.
11. Immunosuppressed patients.
12. Non-elective procedures.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston Scientific Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Kansas Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bristol Whiles, MD

Assistant Professor of Urology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bristol Whiles, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Kansas Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Kansas Medical Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jane Ledesma

Role: CONTACT

913-588-8721

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jane Ledesma

Role: primary

913-588-8721

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Li P, Huang Z, Sun X, Yang T, Wang G, Jiang Y, Ke C, Li J. Comparison of Vacuum Suction Sheath and Non-Vacuum Suction Sheath in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. J Invest Surg. 2022 May;35(5):1145-1152. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1995538. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34902273 (View on PubMed)

Liu Y, Zhu W, Zeng G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with suction: is this the future? Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Mar 1;31(2):95-101. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000854.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33470685 (View on PubMed)

Traxer O, Keller EX. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1883-1894. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30729311 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00161413

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SP TLF Versus Ho:YAG Laser
NCT05048706 COMPLETED
Thulium Fiber Laser Prospective Trial
NCT05814133 RECRUITING NA