Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-01
2026-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Super Pulse Fiber Thulium Laser and Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Fragmentation During Ureteroscopy
NCT06667557
Holmium Vs Trilogy Kidney Stones GUY's 1-2
NCT04559321
Thulium vs. Hol:YAG Laser
NCT05808257
Thulium Fiber Laser vs. Holmium:YAG Laser for the Ureteroscopic Treatment of Patients With Urinary Stone Disease
NCT06306222
Efficacy of Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06489366
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
No prior studies to date have exclusively investigated mini-PCNL outcomes with Ho:YAG and TFL when using VA-RAS. This study addresses the literature paucity regarding the outcomes when utilizing the high-power Ho:YAG with MOSES technology vs. TFL in mini-PCNL with VA-RAS. This study hypothesizes that the Ho:YAG may provide more efficient stone clearance, secondary to its superior ability to fragment stones when compared to the TLF laser, which primarily dusts despite the laser settings utilized.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MiniPCNL with HoYAG
In Arm 1, participants will undergo miniPCNL with ClearPetra™ vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath with HoYAG laser platform. Participants will undergo miniPCNL per standard of care
HoYAG laser
Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG laser or TFL laser group for miniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.
MiniPCNL with TFL
In Arm 2, participants will undergo miniPCNL with ClearPetra™ vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath with TFL laser platform. Participants will undergo miniPCNL per standard of care
TFL laser platform
Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG or TFL laser group for MiniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HoYAG laser
Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG laser or TFL laser group for miniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.
TFL laser platform
Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG or TFL laser group for MiniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with kidney stones, with stone burden larger than 15 mm.
3. Patients undergoing new percutaneous access with primary, supine, unilateral mini-PCNL.
Exclusion Criteria
5. Patients undergoing simultaneous treatment of contralateral kidney stones during the same procedure.
6. Patients undergoing simultaneous treatment of ureteral stones during the same procedure.
7. Pregnant patients.
8. Presence of genitourinary anatomical abnormalities.
9. Uncorrected coagulopathy.
10. External urinary catheters.
11. Immunosuppressed patients.
12. Non-elective procedures.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boston Scientific Corporation
INDUSTRY
University of Kansas Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bristol Whiles, MD
Assistant Professor of Urology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bristol Whiles, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Kansas Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Li P, Huang Z, Sun X, Yang T, Wang G, Jiang Y, Ke C, Li J. Comparison of Vacuum Suction Sheath and Non-Vacuum Suction Sheath in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. J Invest Surg. 2022 May;35(5):1145-1152. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1995538. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
Liu Y, Zhu W, Zeng G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with suction: is this the future? Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Mar 1;31(2):95-101. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000854.
Traxer O, Keller EX. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1883-1894. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00161413
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.