Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficiency of Holmium Laser Settings on Urinary Stones

NCT ID: NCT03526458

Last Updated: 2021-09-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-30

Study Completion Date

2021-03-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the time to acceptable stone fragmentation during clinical use of the holmium laser when using energy settings 0.2J vs 0.8J. The hypothesis is that holmium laser energy settings 0.8J will require less time than lower energy settings 0.2J for fragmenting urinary stones. The clinical practice is to treat urinary stones until the stone is reduced to fragments ≤ 2 mm in size. This is determined by using the laser fiber which is 273 microns to visually estimate the size of the resultant fragments as described by Patel et al, J Endo 2014. Investigators will standardize the effect of stone size by creating a ratio of stone size to treatment time. In this study, the frequency is set at 15Hz. Thus, the study contains two arms: 0.2J\&15Hz, and 0.8J\&15Hz. Patients will be randomized into the two groups by the ratio of 1:1.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The only interventions imposed on subjects as a result of this study are (1) pre-procedural randomization to laser lithotripsy with either 0.2J or 0.8J energy setting, and (2) the use of patient information in describing results. All the other activities are part of the routine clinical practice in the department. Participation in the study will not alter the patients' preoperative, or postoperative care. During surgery, patients' stones will be treated in accordance with the routine clinical practice of fragmenting stones into small pieces (\<2 mm). All patients enrolled will undergo routine post-operative follow up including clinic appointments and imaging evaluation. Any complications will be recorded, reported, and treated appropriately. A fixed frequency will be used (15Hz). Thus, the study contains two arms: 0.2J\&15Hz, and 0.8J\&15Hz. Patients will be randomized into the two groups by the ratio of 1:1. A total of 1 clinic visit (i.e., the stone surgery, approximately 5-6 hours, depending on the duration of the surgery) is needed for this study.

The study procedures are:

1. A study team member who is affiliated with the patient's clinical care (e.g., the surgeon) will initially approach the patients who are scheduled laser lithotripsy treatment of urinary stones. (i.e. informed that there's a research study they may be eligible for, and asked if they want to learn more about it).
2. If the patient is interested in the study, a member of the research team will approach him/her for enrollment.
3. Once the consent form is obtained, patients' medical background will be reviewed for inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be included in the study; patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria will be excluded.
4. Patients will be randomized to either 0.2J\&15Hz or 0.8J\&15Hz (randomization ratio 1:1) group.
5. Patients will undergo stone surgeries with the laser setting that they are randomized to. The patient's stone(s) will be treated in accordance with the routine clinical practice of fragmenting stone into small pieces (≤ 2mm). The faculty surgeon (i.e., Dr. Nakada) will perform all surgeries.
6. Fragmentation time as well as other information (total surgery time, complications, stone information, and number of stones treated) is collected.
7. After surgery, the patients will then continue on normal postoperative pathway. Postoperative complications will be collected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stone Ureter Stone;Renal Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Holmium:YAG laser: 0.2J&15Hz

Patients are assigned to treat stones with 0.2J\&15Hz of the holmium laser.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Holmium:YAG laser

Intervention Type DEVICE

Treatment of urolithiasis is commonly done using the holmium:YAG laser as this has been shown to be a safe and effective method of treating a wide variety of stones and is currently considered the standard of care (AUA Guideline Panel on the Surgical Management of Stones)

Holmium:YAG laser: 0.8J&15Hz

Patients are assigned to treat stones with 0.8J\&15Hz of the holmium laser.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Holmium:YAG laser

Intervention Type DEVICE

Treatment of urolithiasis is commonly done using the holmium:YAG laser as this has been shown to be a safe and effective method of treating a wide variety of stones and is currently considered the standard of care (AUA Guideline Panel on the Surgical Management of Stones)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Holmium:YAG laser

Treatment of urolithiasis is commonly done using the holmium:YAG laser as this has been shown to be a safe and effective method of treating a wide variety of stones and is currently considered the standard of care (AUA Guideline Panel on the Surgical Management of Stones)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients at least 18 years of age
* Patients with urinary stones who require endoscopic treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients \< 18 years of age
* Pregnant patients
* Pre-menopausal females who have not been on approved birth control for at least 1 month pre-operatively
* Patients with stones known to be refractory to treatment with the holmium laser
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephen Nakada, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A539800

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SMPH/UROLOGY

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Protocol Version 10/30/2017

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2017-0252

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Thulium vs. Hol:YAG Laser
NCT05808257 COMPLETED NA
Moses vs. Thulium Laser Study
NCT04963062 COMPLETED PHASE4
HoYAG vs TFL in miniPCNL With ClearPetra
NCT07087977 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
SP TLF Versus Ho:YAG Laser
NCT05048706 COMPLETED