Moses vs. Thulium Laser Study

NCT ID: NCT04963062

Last Updated: 2023-06-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

114 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-16

Study Completion Date

2023-05-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The incidence of urinary tract stone disease is increasing. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, as of 2012, 10.6% of men and 7.1% of women in the United States are affected by renal stone disease. This has led to an increased demand on Urologists for efficient and safe surgical treatment of stone disease. Over the past two decades, ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy has become the treatment of choice for most ureteral and renal stones globally. The holmium laser is considered the gold standard for laser lithotripsy. Holmium laser lithotripsy with Moses and the thulium laser are new technologies meant to improve the efficiency of laser lithotripsy. Both are FDA approved treatment modalities for stone disease. Two in vitro studies have compared Moses versus thulium and shown that thulium has higher ablative volumes then the holmium laser with Moses, but no clinical trials have compared the two treatment modalities.

In this study, investigators are going to conduct a prospective, randomized clinical trial to determine whether there is a difference in procedural time, intraoperative parameters or stone free rate between the Holmium laser with Moses and the thulium laser. This is significant as this may lead to shorter overall operative times, which may result in decreased operative costs and complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Tract Stone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be randomized (ratio 1:1) at the time of enrollment to be treated with either the holmium laser with Moses or the thulium laser. Investigators will use Permuted Block Randomization (stratified by stone size 3 - 10 mm or 11-20 mm) (block size 4).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Participants treated with Holmium laser with the Moses laser

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Holmium laser with Moses lasers

Intervention Type DEVICE

The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.

Participants treated with Holmium laser with the thulium laser

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Holmium laser with thulium lasers

Intervention Type DEVICE

The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Holmium laser with Moses lasers

The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Holmium laser with thulium lasers

The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants with renal or ureteral urinary stones who require endoscopic treatment in the outpatient operating room
* Participant's stone size in a single renal unit of 3-10 mm and 11-20 mm. Stone size is defined as the largest diameter of a single stone on pre-operative CT. Participants with multiple stones will be included as long as their largest stone size falls within the above parameters.

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants under 18 years of age and over 89 years old.
* Pregnant participants
* Participants with transplant kidneys
* Participants with irreversible coagulopathy
* Participants with known ureteral stricture disease
* Participants who do not have a pre-operative CT.
* Non-English speaking, vulnerable participants such as lacking of decision-making capability, prisoner, adult unable to consent, will not be enrolled.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephen Nakada, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A539800

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SMPH/UROLOGY/UROLOGY

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Protocol ver 11-29-2021

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2021-0695

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Thulium vs. Hol:YAG Laser
NCT05808257 COMPLETED NA
HoYAG vs TFL in miniPCNL With ClearPetra
NCT07087977 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Thulium Fiber Laser Prospective Trial
NCT05814133 RECRUITING NA