Trial Outcomes & Findings for Moses vs. Thulium Laser Study (NCT NCT04963062)
NCT ID: NCT04963062
Last Updated: 2023-06-22
Results Overview
Time from the minute the ureteroscope is inserted into the participant to the time the ureteroscope has been removed will be reported as procedural time.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
114 participants
up to 6 hours
2023-06-22
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
56
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
52
|
56
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
withdrew by the study team
|
4
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Moses vs. Thulium Laser Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
n=52 Participants
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
n=56 Participants
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
Total
n=108 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=5 Participants
|
59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=7 Participants
|
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
107 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 6 hoursTime from the minute the ureteroscope is inserted into the participant to the time the ureteroscope has been removed will be reported as procedural time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
n=52 Participants
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
n=56 Participants
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with moses laser.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with thulium laser.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Procedural Time (Minutes)
|
20 minutes
Interval 11.0 to 28.0
|
17 minutes
Interval 13.0 to 24.0
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline(pre-operative) and approximately 8 weeksPopulation: patients who did not have post operative image were not able to access stone free rate
Stone free rate (SFR) (%) are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual stone fragments in the urinary tract which were defined as ≦ 4mm, asymptomatic, non-obstructive and non-infectious stone particles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
n=47 Participants
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
n=53 Participants
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with moses laser.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with thulium laser.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Stone Free Rate
|
40 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 6 hoursTime the laser was in use, not including pedal pauses
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
n=52 Participants
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
n=56 Participants
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with moses laser.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with thulium laser.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Lasing Time (Minutes)
|
2.7 minutes
Interval 1.2 to 6.7
|
3.6 minutes
Interval 1.7 to 7.3
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 6 hoursThe total energy used to fragment the stones into small pieces (≤2 mm)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
n=52 Participants
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
n=56 Participants
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with moses laser.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with thulium laser.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Energy Used (Kilojoules)
|
1.2 KJ
Interval 0.5 to 4.7
|
2.5 KJ
Interval 1.4 to 5.6
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 6 hoursIt is a ratio of ablated stone volume to the laser pulse energy (J/mm3)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
n=52 Participants
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
n=56 Participants
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with moses laser.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with thulium laser.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ablation Efficiency (J/mm^3)
|
1.5 J/mm^3
Interval 0.7 to 2.2
|
1.8 J/mm^3
Interval 1.1 to 3.2
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: approximately 8 weeks (1 month post-operative)Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
n=52 Participants
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
n=56 Participants
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with moses laser.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with thulium laser.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Post-operative Complications
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline(pre-operative) and approximately 8 weeks (1 month post-operative)WISQOL short form is a 6 item questionnaire which can be scored from 1(worst outcome) to 5 (best outcome). The raw score range is 5-30. In the study, standardized total score is used. the range of the standardized total score is 0-100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
n=52 Participants
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
n=56 Participants
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser Post Operative Score
n=52 Participants
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with moses laser.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser Post Operative Score
n=56 Participants
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with thulium laser.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Quality of Life Survey (WISQOL Short Form) Both Pre-operatively and Post-operatively
|
51.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.6
|
49 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.1
|
75.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.1
|
84.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 6 hoursPopulation: Evaluation of the efficiency of the two lasers
Physician evaluation of the laser will be done by Laser Evaluation Instrument. It consists of 6 items which can be scored from 0(worst outcome) to 5 (best outcome). Cumulative score may range from 0-30.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
n=52 Participants
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
n=56 Participants
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with moses laser.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with thulium laser.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Score on the Laser Evaluation Instrument
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-6 hoursThe speed to fragment or dust stones
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
n=52 Participants
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
n=56 Participants
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with moses laser.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser Post Operative Score
Quality of life assessment after treatment for patients treated with thulium laser.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ablation Speed
|
482 mm^3 per minute
Interval 205.0 to 868.0
|
413 mm^3 per minute
Interval 273.0 to 692.0
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Moses Laser
n=52 participants at risk
Holmium laser with Moses lasers: The holmium laser with Moses is FDA approved. It emits two separate laser pulses with a short time interval between them. The first pulse divides the water between the laser fiber tip and the stone and the second pulse hits the stone unobstructed. The goal is to increase stone ablative volume and decrease retropulsion of the stone.
|
Participants Treated With Holmium Laser With the Thulium Laser
n=56 participants at risk
Holmium laser with thulium lasers: The holmium laser with thulium laser is FDA approved. It has a different wavelength then the holmium laser with Moses and thus has slightly different energy properties. It has also been shown to increase ablative volume and decrease retropulsion without any safety concerns
|
|---|---|---|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Obstructing fragments required surgical treatment
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2 • 8 weeks
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Obstructing fragments passed
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
0.00%
0/56 • 8 weeks
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
ER visit and discharge
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3 • 8 weeks
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
UTI treated with outpatient antibiotics
|
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • 8 weeks
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1 • 8 weeks
|
Additional Information
Shuang Li
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place