Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Access

NCT ID: NCT04435132

Last Updated: 2020-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-07

Study Completion Date

2018-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a first-in-man (FIM) study to show feasibility and safety profile of the newly developed robotic device for percutaneous access in PCNL surgery. Patients with renal stone disease who had standard indications for prone PCNL were included in the study. PCNL was conducted with percutaneous puncture with the aid of robotic device with the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy. 5 patients were recruited in this pilot study over a period of 3 months. Punctures were performed by the board-qualified urologist.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All patients underwent preoperative investigations and imaging study (CT Urogram/Intravenous Pyelography) done prior to the operation as per standard operation preparation. Intraoperatively fluoroscopic imaging was done for the patients and the images were synchronized to the software. Robotic arm was placed on the site of surgery as for prone PCNL and diaphragm of the arm was centred over the site of desire calyx of entry. A needle was engaged into the centre of the diaphragm and using the software the need was aligned in the line of puncture automatically based on the fluoroscopic images. After the alignment was done the needle was advanced manually by the surgeon until the entry was confirmed by efflux of urine from the puncture needle. After the entry was confirmed a standard PCNL using 24 F or 30 F Balloon dilator was performed and stone cleared using Cyberwand/ Shockpulse etc. All the intraoperative and perioperative parameters as mentioned in the data collection form was measured. Results was analysed with the main focus on time of obtaining the puncture, accuracy of puncture, radiation exposure time till calyceal entry which was confirmed by free flow of urine and for any complications.

Patients aged between 21 to 75 years old who were diagnosed with kidney stone diseas and planned for prone PCNL with indication for surgery as per standard of care were recruited. They understood the purpose of testing and offered their voluntary and informed consent.

The robotic device i.e. ANT lesses the learning curve of percutaneous access as it reduces the need for surgeon's visualization of the calyceal system and the needle alignment. It also improved efficiency as there is less dependence on human skills during the procedure. As a whole, the FIM trial was a success. The performance of the ANT system during the trial was satisfactory. The robot alignment time is less than 30 seconds. Total puncture time was around 6 minutes and no AEs were reported.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Kidney Stone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Recruitment was carried out in University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) Hospital clinics and impatient wards. 5 patients were recruited with no preferred selection for gender or race. Patients recruited were set to be between 21 to 75 years of age.

Patients presenting to to clinic or admitted to ward for renal stone disease were assessed for indications of PCNL. Patients were assessed for renal stone disease as per standard of care - imaging study with CT scan, renal function, clinical assessment of fitness and suitability for prone PCNL.

Once patients were planned for prone PCNL, they will be informed about this study, the use of robotic device, potential benefits and complications by study investigators. If they are agreeable to informed consent, they will be recruited into the study.
Primary Study Purpose

DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Patients will undergo prone PCNL under fluoroscopic guidance and with the aid of the robotic device. They will then be admitted to inpatient ward as per standard of care for PCNL.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PCNL with the aid of the robotic device

Patients will undergo prone PCNL under fluoroscopic guidance and with the aid of the robotic device.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PCL under fluoroscopy with the aid of the robotic device

Intervention Type DEVICE

During the surgery, the robot was positioned over the estimated insertion point. It was aligned to be parallel to the fluoroscope imaging plane as much as possible. The needle is to be placed through the holder, and slightly penetrate the surface of the skin. An x-ray image is then taken to ensure that the whole device can be seen on the screen. Image calibration is then performed through the software GUI. After which, the clinician is also to perform needle tip selection. After which, needle alignment will then be performed. Once needle alignment is complete, the clinician will then advance the trocar needle into the patient's body, using the fluoroscopy to judge the penetration depth. Once the target has been reached, the needle style is to be extracted. The indication of leakage of fluid through the outer needle confirms the success of the procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PCL under fluoroscopy with the aid of the robotic device

During the surgery, the robot was positioned over the estimated insertion point. It was aligned to be parallel to the fluoroscope imaging plane as much as possible. The needle is to be placed through the holder, and slightly penetrate the surface of the skin. An x-ray image is then taken to ensure that the whole device can be seen on the screen. Image calibration is then performed through the software GUI. After which, the clinician is also to perform needle tip selection. After which, needle alignment will then be performed. Once needle alignment is complete, the clinician will then advance the trocar needle into the patient's body, using the fluoroscopy to judge the penetration depth. Once the target has been reached, the needle style is to be extracted. The indication of leakage of fluid through the outer needle confirms the success of the procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 21 to 75 years
* Diagnosed with kidney stone disease and planned for prone PCNL with indication for surgery as per standard of care
* Subject who understand the purpose of testing, voluntary and informed consent, patients undergoing invasive imaging follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

* Bleeding disorders
* Patient on anticoagulation/antiplatelets drugs
* Pyonephrosis
* Pregnant women
* Not able to have prone position for the procedure due to comorbidities
* Moderate to severe renal failure
* The patient's life expectancy is less than 12 months
* Poor compliance and patients unable to complete the study in accordance with the requirements.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Malaya

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

NDR Medical Technology Pte Ltd

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Malaya Medical Centre

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Malaysia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mozer P, Troccaz J, Stoianovici D. Urologic robots and future directions. Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):114-9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831cc1ba.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19057227 (View on PubMed)

Cinquin P. How today's robots work and perspectives for the future. J Visc Surg. 2011 Oct;148(5 Suppl):e12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.08.003. Epub 2011 Oct 5. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21981795 (View on PubMed)

Oo MM, Gandhi HR, Chong KT, Goh JQ, Ng KW, Hein AT, Tan YK. Automated Needle Targeting with X-ray (ANT-X) - Robot-assisted device for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with its first successful use in human. J Endourol. 2021 Jun;35(6):e919. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0003.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29699415 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831cc1ba

Urologic robots and future directions

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.08.003

How today's robots work and perspectives for the future. J Visc Surg. 2011

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NDR-RA-PA-MY

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
High Supracostal Versus Subcostal Puncture in Adult PCNL
NCT06350045 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4