High Supracostal Versus Subcostal Puncture in Adult PCNL
NCT ID: NCT06350045
Last Updated: 2024-04-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
PHASE4
162 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-01
2028-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Modified Supine vs Prone Position Pnl
NCT05379894
Prone Flexed Position in Percutanous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04345835
Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
NCT04869969
Conventional PCNL Versus Tubeless PCNL
NCT03907930
Paravertebral Versus Caudal Block in Pediatric PCNL
NCT05012215
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Many studies have reported that supracostal access for PCNL is advantageous over infracostal access. By creating a straight path along the kidney's long axis, the upper-pole method guarantees access to the majority of the collecting system and makes it simpler to manipulate the rigid nephroscope and other rigid devices. Therefore, supracostal puncture is perhaps the greatest method for gaining access to the upper pole calyx, where staghorn and big, complicated renal stones are most likely to be located. Although pneumothorax, hydrothorax, and lung damage (1-10%) can result after a supracostal puncture, this injury can now be handled with minimal morbidity thanks to advances in surgical technique and understanding of pleural and diaphragmatic architecture.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
subcostal puncture PCNL
puncturing the subcostal region to reach the kidney
PCNL
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
supracostal puncture PCNL
puncturing the supra eleventh rib
PCNL
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PCNL
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients amenable for PCNL with stone burden between 2 cm - 4 cm (guy score 1-2-3)
Exclusion Criteria
* Single middle calyceal stone.
* Skeletal anomalies.
* Bleeding diathesis.
* Active urinary tract infection.
* Patient refusing participation.
* Patients with active pulmonary and pleural disease.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mahmoud Ahmed Gaber
Principle investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ayman assem, dr
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Assiut University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut University Hospital
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10(3):257-9. doi: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084.
Galvin DJ, Pearle MS. The contemporary management of renal and ureteric calculi. BJU Int. 2006 Dec;98(6):1283-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06514.x. No abstract available.
He Z, Tang F, Lu Z, He Y, Wei G, Zhong F, Zeng G, Wu W, Yan L, Li Z. Comparison of Supracostal and Infracostal Access For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol J. 2019 May 5;16(2):107-114. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4727.
Sampaio FJ. Renal anatomy. Endourologic considerations. Urol Clin North Am. 2000 Nov;27(4):585-607, vii. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70109-9.
Sinha M, Krishnappa P, Subudhi SK, Krishnamoorthy V. Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective comparative study. Indian J Urol. 2016 Jan-Mar;32(1):45-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.173121.
Mousavi-Bahar SH, Mehrabi S, Moslemi MK. The safety and efficacy of PCNL with supracostal approach in the treatment of renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Dec;43(4):983-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-9916-y. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
supra 11th puncture PCNL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.