Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

NCT ID: NCT04869969

Last Updated: 2022-07-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-01

Study Completion Date

2021-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

there is an increased incidence of renal stones, especially in the pediatric age group. the percutaneous approach in the pediatric age took a long time till it again accepted among surgeons worldwide. the prone position is the preferred approach to perform percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric age group. this study aims to compare supine versus prone position percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric age group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The incidence of renal stones in the pediatric age group increased from 18.4 to 57.0% per100,000 children in the period from 1999 to 2008. The acceptance of PCNL in pediatrics was slow at first due to concerns of the small kidney size compared to relatively large instruments percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients was conventionally performed in the prone position for historical reasons, being more familiar to surgeons and it was considered safer to avoid colonic injury.

Supine PCNL has several valuable advantages to pediatric patients in particular better irrigation shorter operative time with a comparable outcome with the prone position.

our study aims to assess the efficacy and the safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position in comparison to the prone position in the pediatric age group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Stone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

percutaneous nephrolithotomy to be performed in both supine and prone position
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
patients and the statistician were blinded to the type of the intervention

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy

percutaneous nephrolithotomy to be done in the supine position

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

percutaneous nephrolithotomy (supine position)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

percutaneous nephrolithotomy to be done in the supine position

prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy

percutaneous nephrolithotomy to be done in the prone position

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

percutaneous nephrolithotomy ( prone position)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

percutaneous nephrolithotomy (supine position)

percutaneous nephrolithotomy to be done in the supine position

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

percutaneous nephrolithotomy ( prone position)

percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients aged from two to sixteen years old with single or multiple renal stones indicated for percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with renal anomalies, bleeding tendency, elevated kidney function tests for age, previous renal surgical intervention on the same site of intervention.
* patients with skeletal abnormalities and spine deformities were also excluded
* patients with a single kidney were also excluded
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Maher Gamil Ahmed Higazy

assistant lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ain Shams University hospital

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R32/ 2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

High Supracostal Versus Subcostal Puncture in Adult PCNL
NCT06350045 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4