Robotic-assisted (MAKO) Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis

NCT ID: NCT07201207

Last Updated: 2025-10-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

170 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-09-30

Study Completion Date

2037-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Total knee arthroplasty is a golden standard procedure for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, up to 20% of the patients are not satisfied with the outcome. Recently, robotic-assisted TKAs have been developed to offer individual alignment and to achieve accuracy in positioning with more subtle soft-tissue handling, thus possibly leading into better outcome.

Hypothesis: The investigators hypnotize that, robotic-assisted TKA is superior to manual TKA for end-stage osteoarthritis in respect to functional outcome, short-term rehabilitation and cost-efficiency.

Trial desing: The investigators will conduct a single-center, randomized, controlled, double blinded superiority trial of 24-months to compare robotic-assisted and manual total knee arthroplasty in respect to functional outcome, implant positioning, short-term rehabilitation and cost-efficiency with up to 10 years follow-up for complications.

The principle outcome measure will be patient reported outcome measure (PROM) Oxford knee score (OKS) points (0-48 points) at two years after surgery. Minimal clinically important difference will be considered as 5 points. Other PROMS, patient satisfaction, short-term rehabilitation, implant positioning, knee range of motion, length of sick leave and cost efficiency will also be reported. Patients will be followed up to 10 years for complications (infection, manipulation and revisions).

This study will be conducted in Central Hospital of Satakunta (Satasairaala), Finland. The investigators will recruit 170 adult patients (aged 50-80), with end-stage (Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV) primary osteoarhritis. Patients will be randomly assingned to either robotic-assisted or manual TKA. Patients will be blinded by the intervention method used. Personnel and investigators assessing the patients and interpreting the data will also be blinded to the surgical method.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

The intervention group will undergo MAKO assisted RATKA. The patients will have individualized alignment. Knee balance is achieved with bony cuts and implant positioning, to avoid soft tissue releases. A preoperative planning based on computed tomography (CT) scans is made and intraoperatively computer assisted gap balancing is performed based on the plan and patient's soft tissue envelope and native joint line. The precise pre-operative planning, balancing and alignment method has been described by Calliess T el al.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

In robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with the guidance of the robot according to CT-based plan.

Manual total knee arthroplasty

The control group will undergo manual jig-guided TKA, with bony cuts made to achieve neutral mechanical axis, and if necessary, knee balancing will be performed by soft tissue releases. Weight bearing semi-flexion radiographs and long leg radiographs are used for preoperative planning. Intramedullary guiding rod is used in femur to align the cuts in 6 to 7 degrees of valgus. Femoral component rotation is fixed to trans-epicondylar line. Tibia cuts are aligned with either intra- or extramedullary guiding rod according to the preference of the surgeon. Tibia component rotation is fixed to medial one-third of tibial tubercle. After bony cuts, knee balancing is performed with soft-tissue and ligament releases if necessary.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Manual total knee arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In manual total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with jig guides according to whole leg weight bearing x-ray planning.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

In robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with the guidance of the robot according to CT-based plan.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Manual total knee arthroplasty

In manual total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with jig guides according to whole leg weight bearing x-ray planning.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Traditional total knee arthroplasty Jig-guided total knee arthroplasty

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age over 50 and below 80 years
* End-stage Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV KOA
* Failed conservative treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis
* Rheumatoid arthritis
* Previous knee infections
* Previous knee surgery (other than diagnostic arthroscopy or meniscectomy)
* Knee range of motion within 15 to 100 degrees
* Mechanical axis over 15 degrees of varus or over 10 degrees of valgus
* Body mass index over 40 kg/m2
* Significant patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade III or IV)
* Diabetes treated with insulin
* Malignancy with ongoing treatment
* Systemic glukocorticosteroid or antimetabolite medication during the last 5 years
* Conditions that do not allow general anesthesia
* Patients' denial for operative treatment and/or participation in the trial
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Satakunta Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Juha Kukkonen

Docent, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Silja Voutilainen, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Juha Kukkonen, dos MD

Role: CONTACT

+358 45 177 7747

Aleksi Annaniemi, PhD MD

Role: CONTACT

+358 505117060

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

VARHA/28584/13.02.02/2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.