Robotic-assisted (MAKO) Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT ID: NCT07201207
Last Updated: 2025-10-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
170 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-09-30
2037-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: The investigators hypnotize that, robotic-assisted TKA is superior to manual TKA for end-stage osteoarthritis in respect to functional outcome, short-term rehabilitation and cost-efficiency.
Trial desing: The investigators will conduct a single-center, randomized, controlled, double blinded superiority trial of 24-months to compare robotic-assisted and manual total knee arthroplasty in respect to functional outcome, implant positioning, short-term rehabilitation and cost-efficiency with up to 10 years follow-up for complications.
The principle outcome measure will be patient reported outcome measure (PROM) Oxford knee score (OKS) points (0-48 points) at two years after surgery. Minimal clinically important difference will be considered as 5 points. Other PROMS, patient satisfaction, short-term rehabilitation, implant positioning, knee range of motion, length of sick leave and cost efficiency will also be reported. Patients will be followed up to 10 years for complications (infection, manipulation and revisions).
This study will be conducted in Central Hospital of Satakunta (Satasairaala), Finland. The investigators will recruit 170 adult patients (aged 50-80), with end-stage (Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV) primary osteoarhritis. Patients will be randomly assingned to either robotic-assisted or manual TKA. Patients will be blinded by the intervention method used. Personnel and investigators assessing the patients and interpreting the data will also be blinded to the surgical method.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mako Cementless TKA vs Mako Cemented TKA
NCT06929871
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Sagittal Alignment Difference Between Mako Robotic TKA and Manual TKA
NCT06527911
Total Knee Arthroplasty Robot Assisted With MAKO™ Robotic System Compared to the Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty by Mechanical Ancillary
NCT03566875
A Prospective Study to Evaluate Robot Assisted Total Knee Replacement Outcomes
NCT03523897
Mako Functionally Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Mako Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04092153
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
The intervention group will undergo MAKO assisted RATKA. The patients will have individualized alignment. Knee balance is achieved with bony cuts and implant positioning, to avoid soft tissue releases. A preoperative planning based on computed tomography (CT) scans is made and intraoperatively computer assisted gap balancing is performed based on the plan and patient's soft tissue envelope and native joint line. The precise pre-operative planning, balancing and alignment method has been described by Calliess T el al.
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
In robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with the guidance of the robot according to CT-based plan.
Manual total knee arthroplasty
The control group will undergo manual jig-guided TKA, with bony cuts made to achieve neutral mechanical axis, and if necessary, knee balancing will be performed by soft tissue releases. Weight bearing semi-flexion radiographs and long leg radiographs are used for preoperative planning. Intramedullary guiding rod is used in femur to align the cuts in 6 to 7 degrees of valgus. Femoral component rotation is fixed to trans-epicondylar line. Tibia cuts are aligned with either intra- or extramedullary guiding rod according to the preference of the surgeon. Tibia component rotation is fixed to medial one-third of tibial tubercle. After bony cuts, knee balancing is performed with soft-tissue and ligament releases if necessary.
Manual total knee arthroplasty
In manual total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with jig guides according to whole leg weight bearing x-ray planning.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
In robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with the guidance of the robot according to CT-based plan.
Manual total knee arthroplasty
In manual total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with jig guides according to whole leg weight bearing x-ray planning.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* End-stage Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV KOA
* Failed conservative treatment
Exclusion Criteria
* Rheumatoid arthritis
* Previous knee infections
* Previous knee surgery (other than diagnostic arthroscopy or meniscectomy)
* Knee range of motion within 15 to 100 degrees
* Mechanical axis over 15 degrees of varus or over 10 degrees of valgus
* Body mass index over 40 kg/m2
* Significant patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade III or IV)
* Diabetes treated with insulin
* Malignancy with ongoing treatment
* Systemic glukocorticosteroid or antimetabolite medication during the last 5 years
* Conditions that do not allow general anesthesia
* Patients' denial for operative treatment and/or participation in the trial
50 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Satakunta Central Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Juha Kukkonen
Docent, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Silja Voutilainen, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VARHA/28584/13.02.02/2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.