A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Sagittal Alignment Difference Between Mako Robotic TKA and Manual TKA
NCT ID: NCT06527911
Last Updated: 2024-07-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-09-01
2026-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Robotic-arm Assisted Total Knee Replacement and Traditional Total Knee Replacement
NCT05391152
Robotic-assisted (MAKO) Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT07201207
Mako Cementless TKA vs Mako Cemented TKA
NCT06929871
Early Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Versus Conventional TKA
NCT05987839
Comparative Study of Navigation-assisted OrthoPilot® Elite and Robotic-assisted MAKO® Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05980442
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
II. Content of Clinical Trials (I) Overall Design and Sample Size This study is a prospective clinical investigation, encompassing two groups: ① the Mako robot-assisted TKA group: patients with osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent Mako robot-assisted TKA at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between September 2024 and September 2026; and ② the manual TKA group: patients with OA who underwent manual TKA at the same hospital between September 2024 and September 2026.
(II) Randomization and Control in the Trial Randomized Controlled Trial (III) Content This clinical study aims to compare the differences between the extension demonstrated during Mako robot-assisted TKA surgery and the actual postoperative extension, proposing a mathematical formula to reflect these discrepancies. Through the validation of intraoperative and postoperative data, the study aims to guide the extension during Mako-assisted TKA. Additionally, In Mako-assisted TKA, there is a femoral prosthesis bowing down issue, and the posterior inclination angle of the tibial plateau differs from that of manual TKA. Consequently, the sagittal femoral bowing down angle and posterior inclination angle of the tibial plateau were compared between robot-assisted TKA and manual TKA to verify the differences between the groups.This study was conducted at the Joint Surgery Department of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, with participants meeting inclusion criteria and not violating exclusion criteria, and having signed informed consent forms approved by the ethics committee.
III: Trial Procedure (I) Participant Enrollment Physicians selected osteoarthritis (OA) patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at our hospital from September 2024 to September 2026, and screened them based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. If a patient met the inclusion criteria, the details of the research project were thoroughly explained to them, and they were required to sign the relevant informed consent form.
(II) Methodology A clinical study was conducted at the Joint Surgery Department of the Chinese PLA General Hospital from September 2024 to September 2026, involving 50 patients each undergoing Mako robot-assisted TKA and manual TKA (Stryker Triathlon prosthesis). Basic patient information, including ID number, name, gender, age, height, and weight, was recorded. Preoperative and postoperative full-length lateral radiographs of the lower limbs, bilateral knee joint lateral radiographs, and sagittal EOS of the lower limbs were taken for all patients. An experienced researcher measured the posterior slope angle of the tibial plateau preoperatively and postoperatively using the Mako robot-assisted TKA, as well as the extension angle displayed by the Mako at the end of the TKA procedure. Based on the differences preoperatively and postoperatively in the 50 cases of Mako robot-assisted TKA, a mathematical formula reflecting extension was proposed and validated. Preoperative and postoperative coronal HKA, LDFA, and MPTA measurements were taken for both Mako robot-assisted TKA and manual TKA; preoperative and postoperative sagittal measurements of the posterior slope angle of the tibial plateau; and postoperative femoral prosthesis head tilt angle were recorded, and statistical analysis was conducted to compare the sagittal angle differences between Mako robot-assisted and manual TKA.
(III) Clinical Evaluation Indices (1) Primary Outcome Measures:
1. The extension angle displayed by the Mako robot at the conclusion of the Mako-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) procedure;
2. Sagittal plane femoral anterior arch angle;
3. Preoperative and postoperative coronal hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angles, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) in Mako robot-assisted TKA and manual TKA;
4. Preoperative and postoperative sagittal measurement of the tibial plateau posterior slope angle; postoperative femoral prosthesis head-down angle.
(2) Secondary Observational Indicators
1\. Basic demographic data of the patients.
* Statistical Analysis Methods All results were computed using SPSS 26.0. A comprehensive enumeration of the collected data will be presented, followed by a descriptive summary of the data. Categorical variables will be summarized using frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables will be summarized by the number of subjects at each evaluation time point, mean values, mean differences relative to baseline values (where appropriate), medians, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals, minimum values, and maximum values.
Prior to database lock, the definitive statistical analysis plan will be established, and the pertinent clinical and statistical personnel will document their decisions regarding the inclusion or exclusion of data from each subject.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mako robot assisted TKA
Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent Mako robot-assisted TKA at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between September 2024 and September 2026.
No interventions assigned to this group
Manual TKA
Patients with OA who underwent manual TKA at the Chinese PLA General Hospital between September 2024 and September 2026.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. OA patients who underwent Mako robot assisted TKA and manual TKA (Stryker Triathlon prosthesis) in the Department of joint surgery of the PLA General Hospital from September 2024 to September 2026;
3. All patients were required to take full-length anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of lower limbs, anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of both knees, and lower limb sagittal EOS before and after surgery;
4. Physical and mental health, able to participate in and cooperate with the test;
5. Patients are willing to participate in the study and sign written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Combined with knee meniscus injury, anterior cruciate ligament injury and other diseases that may affect the sagittal force line of the knee joint
3. Combined with other diseases that may affect the study
4. Patients refused to use their imaging data and knee score for this study.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese PLA General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jiafeng Yi
Resident doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wei Chai, doctorate
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023KY023-KS001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.