Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty(TKA)

NCT ID: NCT03659318

Last Updated: 2019-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

674 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-01-31

Study Completion Date

2018-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to attempt to enhance the precision of bone preparation, component alignment and ultimately improve clinical results and survivorship of TKA. Although several published data suggest that bone preparation, and knee component alignment were improved by using robotic assistance, there is no high-quality evidence from randomized trials at long-term of which investigators are aware evaluating whether the improved bone preparation and knee component alignment improved clinical function or longevity of the TKA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Robotic-assisted TKA was introduced in an attempt to enhance component alignment and to improve long-term clinical results and implant durability, particularly in younger patients. Several comparative studies of conventional and robotic-assisted TKAs demonstrated that improved alignment of the components was obtained after the robotic-assisted TKAs than conventional TKAs.

To date, however, no comprehensive synthesis of long-term randomized data has been conducted specifically for robotic-assisted TKA, particularly in younger patients. It is crucial to determine whether improved alignment of the TKA components obtained by using robotic-assistance, would improve better long-term and functional results and survivorship of TKAs.

The aims of the current study were to examine the two groups of patients after long-term follow-up to determine whether the clinical results, radiographic and CT scan results, and the survivorship of TKA would be better after robotic-assisted TKA than after conventional TKA.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthritis Knee Arthropathy Robotics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robot

TKA is done with robotic-assisted manner. Final implantation of implants is done by surgeons, same as the conventional way. Robotic-assisted TKA for this arm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Robotic-assisted TKA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total knee arthroplasty is carried out with help of robotic surgery system, using a Robodoc system. CT-based preoperative planning using ORTHODOC (Integrated Surgical Technology Corp) performed in the first step before the day of surgery, and the robotic-assisted surgery using the ROBODOC surgical assistance in the second step. The bone markers are registered to the computer, and the computer arm does all the cutting and preparation of bones. This is in contrast to conventional jigs and cutting blocks. Actual implantation of the implants is done by a surgeon. A Duracon posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prosthesis (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahawh, NJ, USA) are used in all knees.

Conventional

TKA is done with conventional instruments. Conventional TKA for this arm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional TKA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total knee arthroplasty is carried out with classical, conventional, manual method. A surgeon measures the angle, length of the cuts with bone landmarks and specialized surgical instruments. After all the cuts actual implantation is done. A Duracon posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prosthesis (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahawh, NJ, USA) are used in all knees.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic-assisted TKA

Total knee arthroplasty is carried out with help of robotic surgery system, using a Robodoc system. CT-based preoperative planning using ORTHODOC (Integrated Surgical Technology Corp) performed in the first step before the day of surgery, and the robotic-assisted surgery using the ROBODOC surgical assistance in the second step. The bone markers are registered to the computer, and the computer arm does all the cutting and preparation of bones. This is in contrast to conventional jigs and cutting blocks. Actual implantation of the implants is done by a surgeon. A Duracon posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prosthesis (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahawh, NJ, USA) are used in all knees.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional TKA

Total knee arthroplasty is carried out with classical, conventional, manual method. A surgeon measures the angle, length of the cuts with bone landmarks and specialized surgical instruments. After all the cuts actual implantation is done. A Duracon posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prosthesis (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahawh, NJ, USA) are used in all knees.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* end stage knee arthritis

Exclusion Criteria

* mild knee deformity
* inflammatory arthritis
* foot and ankle disorder
* dementia
* hip disease
* history of a stroke
* older than 65 years of age
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ewha Womans University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Young Hoo Kim

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Sep;77(9):1331-4. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199509000-00006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7673281 (View on PubMed)

Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3068365 (View on PubMed)

Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:111-6. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318126c0c0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17563698 (View on PubMed)

Crowder AR, Duffy GP, Trousdale RT. Long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in young patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Oct;20(7 Suppl 3):12-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.05.020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16213997 (View on PubMed)

Decking J, Theis C, Achenbach T, Roth E, Nafe B, Eckardt A. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: the accuracy of CT-based component placement. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Oct;75(5):573-9. doi: 10.1080/00016470410001448.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15513489 (View on PubMed)

Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Oct;31(10):2353-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 May 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27325369 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RoboTKA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.