Comparative Outcomes Between Image-based Versus Imageless Robot-assisted Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT03954912

Last Updated: 2019-06-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-01

Study Completion Date

2018-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective cohort study was conducted with the aim of comparing relevant clinical outcomes which included intra (surgical time and blood loss), post-operative outcomes (range of motion, function, complications and revisions) and return to activity between imageless and image-based surgical system in medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

this prospective cohort study was conducted between 1st June 2015 and 1st July 2018 at Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. A total of 33 medial compartment OA knee patients were randomly allocated to MAKO or NAVIO robotic assisted UKA. The outcomes assessed were intra-operative outcomes (operative time, blood loss) and postoperative outcomes (function, complications and revision) at 1 year after surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee Arthropathy of Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

prospective cohort study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MAKO robotic assisted UKA

image base (MAKO) robotic assisted UKA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

MAKO assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

MAKO assisted

NAVIO robotic assisted UKA

imageless (NAVIO) robotic assisted UKA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

NAVIO assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

NAVIO assisted

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MAKO assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty

MAKO assisted

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

NAVIO assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty

NAVIO assisted

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients were those deemed suitable for unicondylar knee arthroplasty surgery
* patients who could give informed consent
* patients who willing to attend the prescribed follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who have medial osteoarthritis knee with following condition:

1. Ligament insufficiency (anterior cruciate ligament rupture, collateral ligament insufficiency).
2. Inflammatory arthritis
3. A deformity requiring augmentation
4. Neurological movement disorders
5. pathology of the feet, ankles, hips, or opposite knee causing significant pain or gait alterations
* Patients who ultimately required a total knee arthroplasty (valgus greater than 14 degree, multiple compartment osteoarthritis were contraindications to unicondylar knee arthroplasty.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ramathibodi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jatupon Kongtharvonskul

principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leelasestaporn C, Tarnpichprasert T, Arirachakaran A, Kongtharvonskul J. Comparison of 1-year outcomes between MAKO versus NAVIO robot-assisted medial UKA: nonrandomized, prospective, comparative study. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Mar 12;32(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00030-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32660619 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2/62

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mako Cementless TKA vs Mako Cemented TKA
NCT06929871 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA