Accuracy of MRI-based Patients Matched Instruments vs Jig-based Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

NCT ID: NCT01449474

Last Updated: 2013-02-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2011-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the common and effective procedure for treatment of end-staged knee osteoarthritis. Postoperative alignment of TKA is one of the important factors which effects on survival of prosthesis. High percentage of misalignment has been reported in conventional technique with using the jig based instruments. Several methods and devices were established to solve this problem. Customized or patient matched instruments were the novel technology that made from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of lower limb. With using special software to calculate the alignment axis, it was thought that accurate alignment can be achieved by using this instruments. Therefore, the study aimed to compare the accuracy of MRI based patient matched instruments and jig based instruments in TKA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis of Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Patient matched instruments

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Patient matched instruments

Intervention Type DEVICE

The patients undergo TKA with using patient matched instruments

Group 2

Jig based instruments

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Jig based instruments

Intervention Type DEVICE

The patients undergo TKA with using jig based instruments

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Patient matched instruments

The patients undergo TKA with using patient matched instruments

Intervention Type DEVICE

Jig based instruments

The patients undergo TKA with using jig based instruments

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

The Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments System Zimmer Nexgen LPS MIS system

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients diagnosed primary osteoarthritis of knee and planned to undergo total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous complex surgery of the affected knee
* Metalic implant in the affected lower limb
* Patients who unable or contraindicated to perform MRI
* Extra-articular deformities of the affected lower limb
* Extensive bone loss of distal femur or/and proximal tibia
* More than 30 degrees of knee flexion contracture
* Unable to perform TKA within 12 weeks after MRI
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mahidol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Keerati Charoencholvanich, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mahidol University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R, Pornrattanamaneewong C. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013 Mar;95-B(3):354-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B3.29903.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23450020 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Si050/2554(EC2)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.