Kinematic Versus Mechanical Alignment in Total Knee Replacement
NCT ID: NCT04384913
Last Updated: 2025-03-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
130 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-08-01
2026-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Kinematic- Versus Ligament-balanced Mechanical Alignment in TKA
NCT04436211
A New Technique to Produce Anatomical Alignment Results With Less Midflexion Instability in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02450409
Mechanical Alignment Versus Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06486714
RCT Comparing Robotically-Assisted vs. Manually-Executed Total Knee Arthroplasties
NCT03482349
RSA and Clinical Comparison of Anatomical and Mechanical Alignment in Total Knee Replacement
NCT02256904
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this prospective randomized controlled double-blind study 120 patients with osteoarthritic knees will be treated with a Medial Pivot TKA (Medacta Sphere GMK). The patients are divided into two groups. Group A receive the TKA using mechanical alignment principles, group B receive the kinematic alignment. The surgical technique was equal in both groups. CT-based 3D printed PSI cutting blocks were used for the saw cuts. Pre and postoperative standard x-rays were performed. To determine the subjective and objective outcomes the OKS(Oxford Knee Score), the KSS(Knee Society Sore), the FJS-12(Forgotten Joint Score) and the WOMAC Score were collected.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MA (mechanical alignment)
Patients in group MA (mechanical alignment) will be operated according to mechanical implantation technique. In the mechanical group, femoral and tibial cutting blocks will be designed for a 0-degree angle according to the mechanical axis. Femoral rotation will be aligned with the femoral trans-epicondylar axis. Tibial rotation will follow femoral rotation.
No interventions assigned to this group
KA (kinematic alignment)
Patients in group KA (kinematic alignment) will be operated according to kinematic implantation technique. The kinematic cutting blocks will be designed to resurface the femoral and tibial bones to restore each patient´s pre-arthritic anatomy and Joint line. Based on a available CT dat the prearthritic anatomy is reconstructed by compensating bone defects and restoring the physiological cartilage height of 1,7mm. Femoral Flexion is evaluated by the anterior Cortex of the distal femur, tibia slope is defined to 3° due to ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) loss, but cab be adapted during surgery.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Primary TKA
* UCLA Score (University of California, Los Angeles Score)\>/= 4
* mMPTA: 85°- 90°
* Sum of mMPTA(mechanical medial proximal tibial angle) and mLDFA(mechanical lateral distal femoral angle) between 3°varus and 2°valgus from neutral
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant or breast feeding woman
* Difference in the radius of medial and lateral condyles \>2mm
* Previous osteotomy around the knee
* BMI \>40
* Ligament instability likely to require higher level of constraint
* Previous infection or inflammatory disease
* Any Patient who cannot or will not provide informed consent for participation in the study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hannover Medical School
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Max Ettinger, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover im DIAKOVERE Annastift
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover im DIAKOVERE Annastift
Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
A2-2017-KAvsMA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.