Comparison Between Medial Pivot Versus Symmetric Insert Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT04769544

Last Updated: 2022-04-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The functional outcome and longevity of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still a concern. Despite various developments in TKA designs, including fixed or mobile bearing, cruciate retaining or posterior stabilized, multi or single radius, it remains unclear which design is superior for achieving a physiological kinematic.

In normal healthy knees the medial and lateral tibial condyles are different: the medial is almost flat while the lateral is somewhat convex. Thus, the movement during flexion is asymmetric: during the flexion, the medial condyle is stable throughout the range of motion while the lateral condyle slides anteroposteriorly with respect to femur). Therefore, the native knee requires a specific degree of rollback of the lateral compartment coupled with a medial pivot, which leads to an external axial rotation of the femur. This rollback is thought to be even more pronounced with increasing knee flexion angles to enable deep flexion without excessive shear forces acting at the patella or overloading the extensor mechanism.

In addition, stability throughout flexion is a crucial element to normal knee function. Most TKA designs removal of the ACL, and the PCL in posterior-stabilized design, but the TKA do not fully restore the function of those ligaments.

Based on this philosophy, the medial pivot TKA was designed to provide better function, patient satisfaction and increased survival.

The objective of this study is to analyze whether the medial pivot design provides better outcome and prosthesis survival than conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Candidates for the study will be consecutive patients eligible for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at our center. All patients meeting inclusion criteria will be recruited for enrollment into the study. Informed consent will be obtained from the patient prior to randomization.

At that time, each patient will be randomized into one of two groups by an independent staff using computer generated randomization and allocation concealment. The two patient groups will include:

1. Study group: patients treated with a medial pivot TKA.
2. Control group: patients treated with a conventional TKA. Patients will be preoperatively assessed and postoperatively at regular intervals (6mo, 12 mo, and then annually) by orthopaedic surgeons not involved in the surgeries or cares.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be treated surgically with a TKA. The two patient groups will include: 1) Study group treated a medial pivot TKA; 2) Control group treated with a conventional TKA.

Patients will be followed at regular postoperative intervals by orthopaedic surgeons not involved in the surgeries or cares.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Double Blind. Patients will be allocated into two groups based on randomized 20-block method by an independent assistant using computer generated randomization. Both patients and evaluators will be blinded with regard to the TKA design.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Medial pivot group

Device used: medial pivot total knee arthroplasty design

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

total knee arthroplasty with medial pivot tibial insert or symmetrical insert

Intervention Type DEVICE

standard surgical implantation of total knee arthroplasty

Conventional group

Device used: conventional total knee arthroplasty design

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

total knee arthroplasty with medial pivot tibial insert or symmetrical insert

Intervention Type DEVICE

standard surgical implantation of total knee arthroplasty

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

total knee arthroplasty with medial pivot tibial insert or symmetrical insert

standard surgical implantation of total knee arthroplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary osteoarthritis of the knee
* 50 years and older
* Participants must be able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Inflammatory arthritis
* Traumatic etiology
* Neurologic disease
* Neoplastic disease
* Morbid obesity
* Severe collateral ligament instability (\> 10° varus/valgus)
* Severe knee misalignment (greater than 10° of varus or valgus)
* Flexion contracture greater than 15º
* Prior surgery on the affected knee (except meniscus)
* Knee arthroplasty in the contralateral knee
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Elda University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla, PhD, MD

Head of Orthopaedic Surgery Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Elda University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Elda University Hospital

Elda, Alicante, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+34 966989019

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla, PhD, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MedialPivotPTR2021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Traditional Versus Alternative Alignment in TKR
NCT03196011 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA