Comparing Efficacy Between Restricted Kinematic Alignment vs Mechanical Alignment in Bilateral TKA
NCT ID: NCT06323577
Last Updated: 2024-03-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-14
2026-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:
* Does rKA have better functional outcomes than MA in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients?
* Does rKA have lower pain score than MA in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients? Participants will undergo simultaneous bilateral TKA and randomized one side will use rKA and the other side will use MA.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Functional Recovery Between Restricted Inverse Kinematic Alignment and Adjusted Mechanical Alignment With Robotic-assisted Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.
NCT06835621
Comparative Effect of Mechanical and Functional Alignment in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty on Ankle Alignment
NCT06259032
Comparison Between Robotic-arm Assisted Total Knee Replacement and Traditional Total Knee Replacement
NCT05391152
Functionally Aligned vs Mechanical Axis Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04748510
Comparative Outcomes Between Imageless Robotic-assisted and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04307251
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Restricted kinematic alignment
Restricted kinematic alignment
TKA using restricted kinematic alignment under robotic assisted surgery (MAKO).
Mechanical alignment
Mechanical alignment
TKA using mechanical alignment under robotic assisted surgery (MAKO).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Restricted kinematic alignment
TKA using restricted kinematic alignment under robotic assisted surgery (MAKO).
Mechanical alignment
TKA using mechanical alignment under robotic assisted surgery (MAKO).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee joint and undergo simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty
* ASA classification I-II
Exclusion Criteria
* BMI \> 40kg/m2
* History of previous knee surgery
* Active infection of the knee joint
40 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Thammasat University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yot Tanariyakul
Principle investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Thammasat University
Khlong Luang, Changwat Pathum Thani, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Elbuluk AM, Jerabek SA, Suhardi VJ, Sculco PK, Ast MP, Vigdorchik JM. Head-to-Head Comparison of Kinematic Alignment Versus Mechanical Alignment for Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8S):S849-S851. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.052. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
McEwen PJ, Dlaska CE, Jovanovic IA, Doma K, Brandon BJ. Computer-Assisted Kinematic and Mechanical Axis Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Bilateral Simultaneous Surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Feb;35(2):443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.064. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
Van Essen J, Stevens J, Dowsey MM, Choong PF, Babazadeh S. Kinematic alignment results in clinically similar outcomes to mechanical alignment: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee. 2023 Jan;40:24-41. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TUH rKA vs MA TKA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.