Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty vs Mako Robotic-arm Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT04095845

Last Updated: 2025-07-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-09

Study Completion Date

2024-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall aim of this single-centre, prospective randomised controlled trial is to compare clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes in CO THA versus Mako THA. Patients undergoing Mako THA will form the investigation group and those undergoing CO THA will form the control group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Hip Osteoarthritis Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CO THA

Computerised tomography based planning of conventional total hip arthroplasty

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CO THA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Replacement of arthritic hip with artificial implant using CT-based navigation and conventional technique

Mako THA

Mako robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mako THA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Replacement of arthritic hip with artificial implant using mako robotic-arm assist

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CO THA

Replacement of arthritic hip with artificial implant using CT-based navigation and conventional technique

Intervention Type DEVICE

Mako THA

Replacement of arthritic hip with artificial implant using mako robotic-arm assist

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient has hip osteoarthritis requiring primary THA

* Patient and surgeon are in agreement that THA is the most appropriate treatment
* Patient is fit for surgical intervention following review by surgeon and anaesthetist
* Patient age: Patients 18-80 years of age inclusive
* Gender: male and female
* Patient must be capable of giving informed consent and agree to comply with the postoperative review program
* Patient must be a permanent resident in an area accessible to the study site
* Patient must have sufficient postoperative mobility to attend follow-up clinics and allow for radiographs to be taken

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient is not suitable for primary THA e.g. patient requires revision surgery for previously failed THA

* Patient is not medically fit for surgical intervention
* Patients under the age of 18 or over 80 years of age
* Patient is immobile or has another neurological condition affecting musculoskeletal function
* Patient is already enrolled on another concurrent clinical trial
* Patient is unable or unwilling to sign the informed consent form specific to this study
* Patient lacks capacity to give informed consent
* Patient is unable to attend the follow-up programme
* Patient is non-resident in local area or expected to leave the catchment area postoperatively
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stryker Instruments

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fares S Haddad

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

UCL Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Babar Kayani

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation TRust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCL Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Ayuob A, Haddad FS. Computerised tomography-based planning with conventional total hip arthroplasty versus robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Sep 10;21(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04702-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32912292 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17/0766

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.