Capsulectomy vs Capsulotomy in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clinical Outcomes and Proprioception Evaluation

NCT ID: NCT02749058

Last Updated: 2023-03-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

94 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of our study is to evaluate the differences in functional activities and proprioception after surgery in subjects who underwent hip prosthesis implant with capsulotomy or capsulectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Concerning hip arthroplasty surgery, in patients affected by coxarthrosis, there are two different techniques: one is capsulectomy and the second one is capsulotomy with repairing the capsule at the end of the procedure. Both preserving and excising the capsule are accepted methods and the choice whether repairing the capsule or not is up to the surgeon, since studies have not yet demonstrated the superiority of one of the two techniques. Articular capsule has a physiological role in joint stability and proprioception. The presence of proprioceptive nerve endings in hip joint capsule has been observed both in healthy patients and in those affected by coxarthrosis.

If capsulectomy is performed during primary hip arthroplasty, the pseudocapsule that is formed in place of the native capsule will not have any active neurophysiological role in the hip.

For this reason, investigators compare the two surgical techniques with the purpose of highlighting, if existing, the superiority of one technique on the other in terms of better functional recovery and proprioceptive sensibility.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Arthrosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Capsulectomy

Procedure: Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Group Type OTHER

Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical intervention in which the surgeon will perform anterior capsulectomy during total hip arthroplasty.

Capsulotomy

Procedure: Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Group Type OTHER

Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical intervention in which the surgeon will perform anterior capsulotomy during total hip arthroplasty. Surgeon will repair the joint capsule.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Capsulectomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Surgical intervention in which the surgeon will perform anterior capsulectomy during total hip arthroplasty.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Capsulotomy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Surgical intervention in which the surgeon will perform anterior capsulotomy during total hip arthroplasty. Surgeon will repair the joint capsule.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Elective unilateral primary hip prosthesis utilizing direct anterior approach
* Age ≥ 18
* Signature of the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Documented peripheral neuropathies
* Documented central nervous system diseases that may compromise the balance and/or proprioception
* Presence of other joint prosthesis in the lower limbs
* Revision hip arthroplasty
* Symptomatic osteoarthritis of other joints in the lower limbs (including the controlateral hip) or the spine
* BMI \> 35
* Systemic diseases or clinical conditions that could interfere with the clinical study
* Neuromuscular diseases
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IRCCS San Raffaele

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gianfranco Fraschini

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marco Ometti, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

IRCCS San Raffaele

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

San Raffaele Hospital

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hewitt JD, Glisson RR, Guilak F, Vail TP. The mechanical properties of the human hip capsule ligaments. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jan;17(1):82-9. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.27674.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11805930 (View on PubMed)

Martin HD, Savage A, Braly BA, Palmer IJ, Beall DP, Kelly B. The function of the hip capsular ligaments: a quantitative report. Arthroscopy. 2008 Feb;24(2):188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.024. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18237703 (View on PubMed)

Birnbaum K, Prescher A, Hessler S, Heller KD. The sensory innervation of the hip joint--an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997;19(6):371-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01628504.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9479711 (View on PubMed)

Moraes MR, Cavalcante ML, Leite JA, Macedo JN, Sampaio ML, Jamacaru VF, Santana MG. The characteristics of the mechanoreceptors of the hip with arthrosis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Nov 16;6:58. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-58.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22087603 (View on PubMed)

Bennell K, Dobson F, Hinman R. Measures of physical performance assessments: Self-Paced Walk Test (SPWT), Stair Climb Test (SCT), Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Chair Stand Test (CST), Timed Up & Go (TUG), Sock Test, Lift and Carry Test (LCT), and Car Task. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S350-70. doi: 10.1002/acr.20538. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22588756 (View on PubMed)

Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 May 30;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-10. Epub 2003 May 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12777182 (View on PubMed)

Ometti M, Brambilla L, Gatti R, Tettamanti A, La Cava T, Pironti P, Fraschini G, Salini V. Capsulectomy vs capsulotomy in total hip arthroplasty. Clinical outcomes and proprioception evaluation: Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, double blinded trial. J Orthop. 2019 Sep 12;16(6):526-533. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.09.020. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31680746 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAP_Feb16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.